Bulbapedia outdated?

N

Nando

追放されたバカ
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
10
I have noticed extreme inconsistency in the Pokédex entries for the Gen 4 Pokémon in Bulbapedia. While many are correctly up to date with the English data, many others are still using direct translations of the Japanese data. Right now I can only point out Glameow as one, but I have seen several others too.

For someone like me who is writing and needs the accurate English data for the Gen 4 Pokémon as they are introduced, this is quite a problem. Will this be addressed?
 
Zhen Lin said:
If someone chooses to update it, then, yes. If not, well...
Click to expand...

I have the entire 4th Gen covered on my Diamond. I'd happily do it myself if my account on Bulbapedia worked...
 
llxwarbirdxll said:
I can help if you want. Since my dex is h@xX0r3d, I have all the dex entries filled out.
Click to expand...

It would be much appreciated. Sorry I can't point you to more entries than just Glameow right now, though I *THINK* one of the legendaries has the wrong data too.
 
I'll scan through the first one-hundred pokes tomorrow, and I'll do the rest when I'm really bored.
 
Nando said:
I have the entire 4th Gen covered on my Diamond. I'd happily do it myself if my account on Bulbapedia worked...
Click to expand...

One of the main causes of account not working is an email address that has not been confirmed.
 
Oh wow... I almost forgot to do this. Time to get to work, I guess.

EDIT: I just finished checking the entries of the first 101 Pokemon in Pearl, and none of them were incorrect. I might do it for Diamond too, but I don't have a ROM for that one. I have a legit one, but I obviously can't use Pokesav on that.
 
Last edited:
Nando said:
I recieved the email. The confirmation password won't work.
Click to expand...

That seems unlikely. Either you (or your browser) have inserted extra spaces into the address, or, your browser did not link the entire code.
 
Please note: The thread is from 18 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom