Misty
I'm the TRASH MAN! I eat GAHBAGE!
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Messages
- 5,218
- Reaction score
- 107
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
+1 for human rights.
They know that if the public votes on it, it'll get voted down.
*My state banned it with a statewide vote 8 years ago, ban won by a friggen landslide*
Actually, in the case of Cali, I seem to remember something about the public voting *for* Gay marriage, then it being vetoed by the Governator.
That's horseshit. The people of California said NO to that at a 61%. The left-wing judges overturned the peoples voice. And just when you thought your vote counted.
That's horseshit. The people of California said NO to that at a 61%. The left-wing judges overturned the peoples voice. And just when you thought your vote counted.
But if you disregard the majority vote, it ain't a democracy either.
Even if that is so (and you're probably right), the judges did their job, which is shutting down mob rules/tyranny of the majority and making sure minorities are given the rights the judge interpret the constitution to say they should have.
The people who complain about activist judges are the wolves who'd like what's for dinner to be decided by a vote between two wolves and a sheep.
Majorities should never have the say-so when it comes to the rights of minorities. Especially when those rights don't even effect the lives of the majorities.
It's a good thing the US is a republic.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.