I thought that the time has come for someone to start a new thread on this board. As no one else seems willing to do so, I have decided to do it myself.
What is better for fanworks -
sticking to the canon or creating an AU (Alternate Universe)?
I have to say that I usually tend to drift towards 'alternate universe', but not too dramatic a difference. My characters are still recognisable as the canon characters and most of the background is identical. If I am guilty of 'tweaking' sometimes, to make the characters, technologies or abilities more to my liking... Well, that is a fanwriter's perogative, isn't it? ;-)
Seriously, though, I have read a large number of Alternate Universe stories (and Sailor Moon fanworks are particularly notorious for this) that so completely change the characters and their situations that, apart from the names, they are unrecognisable. Is this really a valid form of fanwriting, or is it just trying to get your original fiction noticed by using the character names from the famous work of a different author? I would say that, in a few cases, AU stories really do cease to be valid fanworks. Their divergance from canon is so extensive that they aren't really derived from the original in any way apart from a few names.
However, this should not be interpreted as a blanket endorsement of absolute adherence to canon. A fanwriter must be willing to turn down a few unexpected paths and take the characters to places and situations never seen in the canon. Otherwise... well what is the point? You might as well just read the canon books or watch the canon show/film. In a more general sense, the canon should not be considered the absoloute limit of what you can do in your story. Just because it has never happened or been seen in the original does not mean that you can't do it in your fanwork.
So, what are your opinions on the value of canon and the place of the AU story?
What is better for fanworks -
sticking to the canon or creating an AU (Alternate Universe)?
I have to say that I usually tend to drift towards 'alternate universe', but not too dramatic a difference. My characters are still recognisable as the canon characters and most of the background is identical. If I am guilty of 'tweaking' sometimes, to make the characters, technologies or abilities more to my liking... Well, that is a fanwriter's perogative, isn't it? ;-)
Seriously, though, I have read a large number of Alternate Universe stories (and Sailor Moon fanworks are particularly notorious for this) that so completely change the characters and their situations that, apart from the names, they are unrecognisable. Is this really a valid form of fanwriting, or is it just trying to get your original fiction noticed by using the character names from the famous work of a different author? I would say that, in a few cases, AU stories really do cease to be valid fanworks. Their divergance from canon is so extensive that they aren't really derived from the original in any way apart from a few names.
However, this should not be interpreted as a blanket endorsement of absolute adherence to canon. A fanwriter must be willing to turn down a few unexpected paths and take the characters to places and situations never seen in the canon. Otherwise... well what is the point? You might as well just read the canon books or watch the canon show/film. In a more general sense, the canon should not be considered the absoloute limit of what you can do in your story. Just because it has never happened or been seen in the original does not mean that you can't do it in your fanwork.
So, what are your opinions on the value of canon and the place of the AU story?
