• Our spoiler embargo for the non-DLC content for Pokémon Legends: Z-A is now lifted! Feel free to discuss the game freely across the site without the need of spoiler tabs, and use content from the game within your profiles!

Cynthia: The Hackin' Ho

DerMißingno

Gutes deutsches Bier
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
14,940
Reaction score
4
Ok, now I'm not making any accusations here, but you have to look at the facts. Cynthia's pokemon all have 31 IV's across the board.. Every single one of them. Now maybe she just used RNG, but that's still pretty suspicious. Also, she used a Garchomp, a pokemon which is widely believed to be broken.

So I'm not saying that Cynthia is a cheater, but just look at the facts. She did all this, and used it to beat all of the other NPC's and become champion.
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

And while we're at it, Lance had some level 50 and below Dragonites!

ZOMG WTF -_-
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

Omg, and in gen 1, his Dragonite knows barrier! That's still illegal to this day!
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

haha, I stopped liking her when I heard all her pokemons have 31 IVs... I mean come on :| that's virtually impossible to do legally. she'd be 90 if she bred them that much the right way. and she's probably not over 30 so what gives?
I'm aware the game makers did it just to make her a challenge... but geez.

of course that leads me to another question... what of Steven's pokemon? is he a hacker too?
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

How do you guys know that her Pokemon have 31 IVs?

It says on Bulbapedia. How Bulbapedia knows, I have no idea. All I do know is that any website with "-pedia" on the end is right.

The programmers just want to make the game challenging by turning all the champions into big filthy cheaters. But now that I know they're cheaters it'll make the win sweeter for me when I used my legitimately obtained and trained Pokémon to beat them. Hahaha.
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

How do you guys know that her Pokemon have 31 IVs?

i believe that, using a certain cheat code, you can catch her pokemon as your own. and whoever did just checked their IVs and noticed they were all 31. or something like that. i might be wrong, though.

goddammit, cynthia! :( not even knowing that she was a hacker made swallowing my pride and using a level 100 pokemon from my sister to beat her feel any better. seriously, my pokemon were doing fine until she sent out milotic, ugh.
 
Last edited:
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

Her Pokemon are not ev-trained though, so it doesn't really matter.
Even those trained Bidoof at the battle tower are way tougher.
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

There are cheats that let you catch trainer's pokémon. If I cheated, I'd be using that, so much easierto complete the pokédex.

/off topic
 
Last edited:
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

I... I... I don't think I'll ever look at Cynthia the same way again...
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

Yeah she uses a Garchomp, an Uber, lol what a noob.

But no seriously no wonder she kicked my ass a few times...more reasons for me to hate the game developers.
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

I... I... I don't think I'll ever look at Cynthia the same way again...

I can't think of her without being reminded of that girl's doll from the Rugrats D:

And I'm pretty sure it's been proven that by using False Swipe bazillions of times that Gym Leaders/E4 can use more Full Restore than it's possible to hold/have enough Pen to buy...
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

I can't think of her without being reminded of that girl's doll from the Rugrats D:

I actually snorted when I read this, especially as the girl would always say "Cynthia!" with a really weird voice.

Cynthia isn't just a hacker, she's a noob as well with her uber.
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

And still I never had any trouble beating her. With my unbalanced team with only a torterra trained. On both Diamond and Platinum.
 
Re: Cynthia: Hacker?

And I'm pretty sure it's been proven that by using False Swipe bazillions of times that Gym Leaders/E4 can use more Full Restore than it's possible to hold/have enough Pen to buy...

I've got to try this...

Cynthia, what a hacker.
 
Please note: The thread is from 16 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom