Do We Want New TYPES? (no)

[Slenderman]

I personaly don't want any new types. We have 16 perfectly good types right now with a good system. I'm just sayin'

 

[Keegman]

Can I say how much I like that you made this thread?


I like that you made this thread.

 

[Slenderman]

Can I say how much I like that you made this thread?


I like that you made this thread.

Good.

 

[The Golden Tyranitar]

This thread seems kinda...Unneeded

 

[Hyasynth]

Do We Want Unnecessary Repeat THREADS? (no).

 

[IceBlue]

Do We Want Unnecessary Repeat THREADS? (no).

^This.

 

[Rocky505]

there's actually 18 types (counting ???)

 

[Josep94]

I personaly don't want any new types. We have 16 perfectly good types right now with a good system. I'm just sayin'

there's actually 18 types (counting ???)

You're both wrong there are 17...

I personally don't want any new types, I think 17 are enough.

 

[Slenderman]

Do We Want Unnecessary Repeat THREADS? (no).

There's a thread titled "Do We Want New TYPES? (yes) this isn't a repeat thread.

 

[Hyasynth]

It's the same thread except that instead of saying 'yes, that would be nice', you're saying 'no, 17 is enough', which is terribly unnecessary.
Posting in the other thread would have gotten the message across.

Perhaps "repeat" isn't the term I'm looking for, but rather "unneeded counterpart". It's not contributing much, that's for sure.

Just saying.

 

[Falconwing]

I agree. I've already said I think 17 is fine and only light and sound might (I use that loosely) be acceptable. No reason to have another thread where I'm just going to post that again.

Oh wait...

 

[Sith Droideka]

Third thread? After only about three months?

 

[Battaman]

We need Internett type:drool:

 

[ForeverFlame]

I agree with the thread title completely. However, this thread as a whole is pretty pointless.

 

[The Outrage]

There's a thread titled "Do We Want New TYPES? (yes) this isn't a repeat thread.

Couldn't we discuss not wanting new types in that thread? (Yes)

In fact, the first two post does just that >_>

 

[RavenKingSage]

Making another thread with the same freaking topic because you don't agree with the title of the original is really, really pathetic.