Does the 4 moves limit exist in the anime?

R

Rafia

leftie infernape FTW
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
919
Reaction score
1
I was just reading a post by user piplup in the 'bagged than tagged' thread saying that croconaw's watergun was replaced by hydro pump, meaning that pokemon have to forget attacks to learn new ones but i remember back in the orange league Drake's dragonite used something like 10 moves in one battle and there must be other examples too.
So does the limit exist or not?
 
Last edited:
I think it only exists as a guideline, not as a strict rule. There were other battles (such as Charizard vs. Dusdclops) where you could definitely see a limit. Charizard's moves in that battle were Dragonbreath, Overheat, Seismic Toss, and Steel Wing. Note the conspicuous absence of Flamethrower, which Charizard has known since before Ash had it.
 
It's a much more recent thing than the Orange Islands period.

I'm going to say yes. We've seen Pokémon gain a new move and then never use a past one from then on. Take Buizel for example, it learned Ice Punch and then never used Water Pulse again. That is most odd considering that it outclasses Water Gun in every way I believe.
 
I wouldn't say so, technically. They seem to 'forget' the moves, but it's mostly due to them not using them as much.

Take Pikachu, for example. At one point, it mainly used Thunderbolt, Thunder, Iron Tail and Quick Attack. Pikachu learns Volt Tackle. Quick Attack disappears from use for a while. Then, about a hundred episodes later or so, Quick Attack is used frequently again, and we see a slow decline of using Thunder, and it is currently being used sparingly.
 
The 4-move limit does exist. I haven't seen Ash's Pikachu use Thunder ever since learning Volt Tackle. (from what I've seen in the anime, its current moves are Quick Attack, Thunderbolt, Iron Tail and Volt Tackle).
 
It doesn't make a lot of sense to have only 4 moves in the anime. So it isn't used. The pokemon can't use all the attacks it learns but 4 is alittle too small.
 
Alyxy said:
I wouldn't say so, technically. They seem to 'forget' the moves, but it's mostly due to them not using them as much.

Take Pikachu, for example. At one point, it mainly used Thunderbolt, Thunder, Iron Tail and Quick Attack. Pikachu learns Volt Tackle. Quick Attack disappears from use for a while. Then, about a hundred episodes later or so, Quick Attack is used frequently again, and we see a slow decline of using Thunder, and it is currently being used sparingly.
Click to expand...

When was the last time pikachu used thunder and agility?
 
Ranger Jack Walker said:
It doesn't make a lot of sense to have only 4 moves in the anime. So it isn't used. The pokemon can't use all the attacks it learns but 4 is alittle too small.
Click to expand...

It's sticking to the mechanics of the games more. DP has done it more than the other sagas have.
 
Rafia said:
When was the last time pikachu used thunder and agility?
Click to expand...

I guess ever since the Battle Frontier saga. If Iteru's right.

But I haven't seen Agility used since the Johto region. Mostly because up until they started making the attacks look more detailed (Corphish's orange Bubblebeam), Quick Attack and Agility had looked identical, just that Quick Attack had a tackle to follow through after dodging the attack. I guess the writers thought Pikachu didn't need it anymore because they had more creative ways to dodge attacks, and the fact that he already can dodge with Quick Attack.
 
The 4 limit obviously exist in the anime, at least in the DP series and I expect this to continue for the BW series too
BTW, said post was my post ( http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showpost.php?p=1945671&postcount=67 )
Khoury's Pokédex clearly didn't mention Water Gun at all, so I really can't see how any more obvious can it be... it's not like Croconaw only used 4 attacks in that battle, the Pokédex pretty much said it doesn't know Water Gun anymore because it learned Hydro Pump
Piplup also didn't use Bide since it learned Hydro Pump... and I'm sure we can find more examples
And while there may be a few rare exceptions, I'm pretty sure they decided to stick to the games' 4 limits and in BW will work even harder to follow this rule, no matter how "ridiculous" it may be in the anime (personally I think special moves like Counter Shield can make up for lost attacks)
 
Piplup said:
The 4 limit obviously exist in the anime, at least in the DP series and I expect this to continue for the BW series too
BTW, said post was my post ( http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showpost.php?p=1945671&postcount=67 )
Khoury's Pokédex clearly didn't mention Water Gun at all, so I really can't see how any more obvious can it be... it's not like Croconaw only used 4 attacks in that battle, the Pokédex pretty much said it doesn't know Water Gun anymore because it learned Hydro Pump
Piplup also didn't use Bide since it learned Hydro Pump... and I'm sure we can find more examples
And while there may be a few rare exceptions, I'm pretty sure they decided to stick to the games' 4 limits and in BW will work even harder to follow this rule, no matter how "ridiculous" it may be in the anime (personally I think special moves like Counter Shield can make up for lost attacks)
Click to expand...

I hope they don't follow that limit.More attacks means more variation, but if they do follow it, they should come up with more attacks like counter shield.
i will edit my first post to give you credit for bringing up that info and giving me the idea for this thread. :)
 
Last edited:
It's ok, no need to credit me XD thanks anyway...
While at first I also thought it may be annoying, I think that it's not as bad as it seems
Especially with stuff like Ember or Water Gun... Flamethrower and Hydro Pump are like the same attacks only imroved... so why still use the old ones? it makes sense they are "forgotten" for the new ones, since it's like the Water Gun "evolved" into Hydro Pump XD
Of course, when we have stuff like Pip learning Hydro Pump and losing Bide for it, that doesn't really makes sense like the previous example... I still think they should've made Pip learn Drill Peck to replace that poor old Peck... especially since it'd be a nice development (first it used a normal Peck, then from DP 11 it learned to make its beak bigger, I'd think next step would be learning Drill Peck)
 
Although it isn't explicitely stated, it seems quite clear that the writers are now sticking (sorta) to the game mechanics.
I don't think its such a bad thing, although I don't agree with the choice of which move is replaced. As Iteru said, Ice Punch should have replaced Water Gun, not Water Pulse.
 
Yes it exists, yes sometimes the moves that are forgotten are questionnable.

But quite frankly, it doesn't bother me. Do we need to see Piakchu use Thundershock and Thunder when they look exactly the same as Thunderbolt? Agility and Quick attack are the same too? Why would Infernape use Flame Wheel when it can use Flare Blitz? Why would Torterra use Razor Leaf when it can use Leaf Storm?

The moves aren't forgotten, they're just replaced by something better and become obselete which is how I always looked at it in the games and in the anime.
 
Gible said:
Yes it exists, yes sometimes the moves that are forgotten are questionnable.

But quite frankly, it doesn't bother me. Do we need to see Piakchu use Thundershock and Thunder when they look exactly the same as Thunderbolt? Agility and Quick attack are the same too? Why would Infernape use Flame Wheel when it can use Flare Blitz? Why would Torterra use Razor Leaf when it can use Leaf Storm?

The moves aren't forgotten, they're just replaced by something better and become obselete which is how I always looked at it in the games and in the anime.
Click to expand...

Yes and no. Remember how Bulbasaur used Leech Seed very early on against a pokemon way back in Kanto, and never really used it again until like, Hoenn? It had Sleep-Powder which it learned after it learned Leech Seed, yet it still uses Leech Seed (along with solarbeam, Vine Whip, and Razor Leaf) primarily.

Charizard. Charizard has a crapload of moves, some of which it still uses and some which it doesn't use as much. For example, Overheat. It's a move it showed along with DragonBreath against Noland, yet he hasn't really used it since. But he still knows it, he just hasn't used it. Dragon Rage is another example. I'm pretty sure he could still use it, he just... doesn't. Same with Pikachu and Thunder. Pikachu still knows Thunder even though it uses Iron Tail, Quick Attack, Volt Tackle, and Thunderbolt. Ash, for whatever reason, just doesn't have Pikachu use it.
 
Well, before moves became a limit, they still use attacks that damage an opponent that it should not have an effect on. Only example is Croagunk Poison Jabbing Scizor early in the DP series and being a Steel type it was supposed to take 0 damage. Another one, yet questionable is Pikachu's Thunderbolt hitting Roark's Onix. I'm unsure if it took any damage from it.

In any case, I'm glad DP followed more closely to the game mechanics. Questionable cases are the monsters using Special attacks yet they actually don't have the Special Attack stats for it. Unsure if the power makes up for the low SAT, like Torterra's Leaf Storm, as I haven't tested this thoroughly.

The Counter Shield, along with spinning evasions, are interesting concepts. Gives me an idea that offensive moves can be used defensively, such as Pikachu's Thunderbolt acting like a 5-second barrier or other crazy concepts.
 
No, there isn't a four move limit. Some pokemon, like Drake's Dragonite, had 10 moves (though it was only to show its strength).
 
I wish they wouldn't follow it, though. It makes absolutely no sense for a sentient creature whose capable of understanding human language to be so freaking stupid that it can't remember more than four moves. It makes everyone look like they have the memory of goldfish.

The pokemon in the show shouldn't have to abide by restraints imposed by a couple of 8-bit games that were released over a decade ago.

(And on that note, the games really should let pokemon have more than four moves, but that's a topic for another thread).
 
Please note: The thread is from 14 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom