Contest Fearow vs Dodrio

Envoy

Formerly GTT
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
705
Fearow vs Dodrio

fearow.png
VS
dodrio.png

Both are Normal/Flying Pokemon. Both are fast as hell. One's grounded, the other one moves much better in the sky. Both are First Gen Pokemon. Both are part of a one-stage only evolutionary line.

Which do you prefer?

Which is more useful?

Who would win in a battle?

I'm going with Fearow if for no other reason that it looks slightly better to me. Not a fan of either of them though.
 
I'm going with Fearow if for no other reason that it looks slightly better to me. Not a fan of either of them though.

Basically this. Never liked either, but I do prefer Fearow slightly over Dodrio.
 
I like Dodrio better. Not only do I have a couple of 'em, but they sure saved me throughout the game :3 Plus, I think it looks better...
 
I don't like pokemon with multiple heads (except Magenton, who's awesome), and Dodrio can't even fly. Fearow gets my vote.
 
Bird with 3 heads? Win. Plus, it it pretty useful. At least more so than Fearow.
 
I like the fact that Dodrio can fly without wings, and has access to the move Tri Attack.
 
How can a wing-less bird fly? I cant even...
Fearow has wings, so Fearow.
 
I prefer Dodrio. A three-headed dodo that can fly without wings? Instant win! Of course, it would kill to have Drill Run like Fearow.
 
Never liked Dodrio. But Fearow is awesome. I still remember the battle between that Fearow who hates Ash and Ash's Pidgeotto/Pidgeot.
 
Fearow for me, man. Fearow has a badass air that the 3-headed dodo doesn't have. They fierce and real cool, too! D8 I used a Fearow in my main Crystal party, and she saved me a lot in Kanto!
 
Fearow was exraordinarily useful for me in Blue, and its design is one of my favorites from Gen I.
 
Fearow, because it's cuter. Yes, I actually find Fearow cute in a way :3
 
Dodrio is one of my top favorite pokémon, so yes, a vote for an awesome tri-headed wingless bird, which still can fly ♥.
 
Please note: The thread is from 6 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom