Generation 5 Region confirmed in a way?

Mitchman

Simpler times ahead
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
10,936
Reaction score
2,335
I am talking about obviously the region where the Shinto Ruins are. I mean they are located between Johto and Sinnoh where Sinnoh is north and Johto is south. Of course the ruins could be in between the 2 on a small land mass but to be so concealed and snow it has to be on some mounain. But yes I do believe whatever region comes next will likely contain that region and Sinnoh as well.
 
hmmm a plausible location could be the mountains near the top of Sinnoh
they dissappear off the map and have clouds cover
 
Could happen but its more likely to be south seeing how Sinnoh is North of Kanto.
 
I bet the next region will be based off of Tōhoku. It fits the description to a t: North of Johto/Kanto and South of Sinnoh. I can Shikoku being accessible after the main quest in Tohoku or a continuation of the main quest in Tohoku since it's Shikoku is close to Johto.

But yes, I see it as GameFreak's unofficial way of confirming Gen V without "spoiling" anything.

I bet the main event Pokemon in Gen V will be an evil counterpart to Arceus, since all three regions acknowledge Arceus as the Creator God of everything and you even witness Arceus' powers which eliminates the possiblity of a higher Creator God who created Arceus. Most Creator Gods in polythestic religons aren't the superior and usually the most famous Gods aren't Creators, but looks like GameFreak opposes that since people built Shrines dedicated to Arceus not to mention other people from different regions "share" him. The Kimono girls were even priestess of his and their spiritual dances (similar with Ho-Oh and Lugia) boosted his power, so it makes more sense for there to be an evil counterpart rather than topping it.

Before this, I frankly wasn't thrilled about Gen V, I tried avoiding Gen V discussion as much as possible since my impression was pretty much "Gen V will come when it comes, right now it's Gen IV and I would rather spend my time enjoying this gen rather than speculating about the next kthanxbai".

It interests me to beyond no end and including the Shinto Ruins beforehand leads to tons of potential, I'm hyped for Gen V now!
 
Last edited:
I doubt Shikoku would be in but Sinnoh. Not only that but if they do go with using the DS again it would be great to do Sinnoh again with gen 5 style not to mention gen 5 with HGSS would be a great way to have 4 regions accessible with Hoenn as well in the obvious RS remakes. But then again all 5 regions would more or less be accessible.
 
I doubt Shikoku would be in but Sinnoh. Not only that but if they do go with using the DS again it would be great to do Sinnoh again with gen 5 style not to mention gen 5 with HGSS would be a great way to have 4 regions accessible with Hoenn as well in the obvious RS remakes. But then again all 5 regions would more or less be accessible.
im still skeptical about the rs remakes
 
shikoku_chugoku.jpg


I'm thinking that if they make ruby/sapphire remakes it will probably include the rest of Shikoku in them that wasn't used in hg/ss(red) and it will be accessible via some tunnel north of fallarbor town and southern Shikoku(green).

The location of the next generation of games i think will be Chugoku. My reasoning is because it is directly northwest of where johto is and assuming the pokemon world is round then chugoku's western point would be very near where sinnoh is. That would make it somewhat of a gateway region between johto and sinnoh. It's also mountainous enough to have the shinto ruins. Plus relations between it and hoenn would seem logical if there does end up being 3rd gen remakes.

Sorry if that sounded confusing but it makes perfect sense to me.
 
Well the fact that when your map points northeast for the Shinto ruins makes me believe its my logical placing. Look:
shintomap.jpg

It definitely is northeast somwhere of Johto or in the northeastern part of the map. And the mountains seem to go out of the map somewhere.
 
It's possible that the Shinto Ruins hint at a new region, however the Sevii Islands in FRLG weren't part of a new region, because they were sort-of part of Kanto.
I'm just saying that it's possible the Shinto Ruins are actually part of Johto, just loosely. But even so that certainly would be cool if they did hint at a new region.
 
Actually the Sevii Islands are a region. In Japanese they are the Sevii Island Region.
 
I bet the next region will be based off of Tōhoku. It fits the description to a t: North of Johto/Kanto and South of Sinnoh. I can Shikoku being accessible after the main quest in Tohoku or a continuation of the main quest in Tohoku since it's Shikoku is close to Johto.

But yes, I see it as GameFreak's unofficial way of confirming Gen V without "spoiling" anything.

I bet the main event Pokemon in Gen V will be an evil counterpart to Arceus, since all three regions acknowledge Arceus as the Creator God of everything and you even witness Arceus' powers which eliminates the possiblity of a higher Creator God who created Arceus. Most Creator Gods in polythestic religons aren't the superior and usually the most famous Gods aren't Creators, but looks like GameFreak opposes that since people built Shrines dedicated to Arceus not to mention other people from different regions "share" him. The Kimono girls were even priestess of his and their spiritual dances (similar with Ho-Oh and Lugia) boosted his power, so it makes more sense for there to be an evil counterpart rather than topping it.

Before this, I frankly wasn't thrilled about Gen V, I tried avoiding Gen V discussion as much as possible since my impression was pretty much "Gen V will come when it comes, right now it's Gen IV and I would rather spend my time enjoying this gen rather than speculating about the next kthanxbai".

It interests me to beyond no end and including the Shinto Ruins beforehand leads to tons of potential, I'm hyped for Gen V now!
The idea of a Satan Pokemon (Houndoom is the closest thing we've got at the moment, I think) would be absolutely awesome.
 
Please note: The thread is from 16 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom