• Our spoiler embargo for the non-DLC content for Pokémon Legends: Z-A is now lifted! Feel free to discuss the game freely across the site without the need of spoiler tabs, and use content from the game within your profiles!

GSC sucked, and if you played it, you know it too.

Status
Not open for further replies.

d.aisuke

Nuzlocke challenge'd
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
890
Reaction score
0
{This is really just a random rant that I probably could've posted in the GSDS thread, but I didn't want to clutter up space.}


So, let me start by saying I've been a Pokemon fan since /January or February of 1999 (damn, I'm old XD)

I used to get up Weekday mornings and watch Doug (if you don't know it, look it up, it was a great cartoon).

One day I just happened to catch the Pokemon anime ( no I don't remember what episode it was) and I've pretty much been hooked ever since (except when I left when RS was released, but I came back as soon as I found out about FRLG, so it's all good).

But anyway, I stated playing the games because I wanted to be just like Ash and do what he did. The first game I played was Yellow in April of 2000. By that time, Marril, Togepi and Snubble had already been reveled, so I was expected them in the game.
Obviously that wasn't the case, and so I was a little under whelmed there, but otherwise I loved the game.

When GS came out I was pretty stoked, since I could get all the new Pokemon and what not, and on Christmas on 2000 I got Pokemon Silver. And then I played it. And I was in love.
As I went through the game I kept thinking, "man, this is awesome, but if they had of done XXX&____ it would have been so much better".

And while most of the things I wanted have been realized in some form or another since GS, HGSS now needs them.

Now, I want everyone (especially you younger fans that didn't start playing until RS or DP) to realize one thing.

(The original ) Pokemon Gold and Silver were and are "Pokemon 2".

They are sequels to Pokemon Red and Blue, and THAT is why they're so horrible.

9/10 years ago nobody gave a shit that the games were shit, because everyone (and I mean EVERYONE) just wanted more POKEMANZ. Kids because they were fans, and adults because they wanted their kids to shut the fuck up and quit harassing them about some silly GameBoy game.

Now, don't get me wrong, GS were my favorite games so far, and I have been (and probably always will be) very nostalgic about them.
{I went ahead and bolded that so we don't have any trouble}

But the games were shit, and I've gonna tell you why.



1 First off, They were sequels.

Generation 2 was fundamentally different from every other generation because they were sequels. Their purpose was to duplicate the success of the original games, and just examining the plot and the rest of the game shows that. In fact, they were originally announced in Japan as “Pokemon 2”. “Pokemon 2 is the ‘Pokemon’ a second time. Just like the Sandlot 2 (Side note, They ruined an epic film with that sequel)



2 They were rushed sequels.

While I don't have quite enough support for this claim, if you examine the GS rom you can find chuck of unused data, and quite a few unused areas.. The safari zone comes to mind here.



3 Story wise, it’s Kanto’s second coming

This is partly true, since in reality the story of every game is basically the same, though at least in every other Gen. they’ve come up with a new Gang. Recycling and continuing the Rocket Gang plot had a lot of potential, but that potential went unrealized in my opinion.



4 TEE HEE, IMMA LOT STRONGER THAN YOU LEADERS!!! ;D

The Gym Leaders were horribly under leveled.
There isn’t really a lot to say here, so I’ll let facts speak for themselves.

RB- 1st Gym, Brock- Geodude Lvl 12, and Onix Lvl 14
RB- 8th Gym, Giovanni- Rhyhorn Lvl 45, Dugtrio Lvl 42, Nidoqueen Lvl 44, Nidoking Lvl 45, and Rhydon Lvl 50
RB Elite 4 Low/High- Lorelei’s Cloyster Lvl 53/ Lance’s Dragonite Lvl 62
Champion (Gary) Alakazam Lvl 59 / Starter Lvl 65

GS1st Gym, Falkner-Pidgey Lvl 7 and Pidgeotto Lvl 9
GS 8th Gym, Clair- Dragonair Lvl 37, Dragonair Lvl 37, Kingdra Lvl40 , and Dragonair Lvl 37
GS Elite 4 Low/High- Will’s Xatu Lvl 40/ Karen’s Houndoom Lvl 47 Champion (Lance) Gyrados Lvl 44/ Dragonite Lvl 50
GS Kanto leaders [Forthcoming, These aren’t in my guidebook]
GS does have Red with Lvl 70 or higher Pokemon, but Do take into account that IMO there was no place to Level up your Pokemon TO Beat him. I was never able to defeat Red.
Btw, LOL @ Lance’s Dragonite LOSING 12 levels after 3 years.


5 WTF, LETTAR POGEYMANZ?


Why create Unown and a plot for them if you’re only going to [BARELY] scratch the surface?
Again, tons of potential wasted.

6 Where are the NEW POGEYMANZ? ;^;

GS introduced 100 new Pokemon, and yet brought more focus to the original 150. My favorite example of this is Houndhour, whom you couldn’t catch until you beat the Elite 4 and got to ROUTE 7 outside of CELADON CITY. IN KANTO. Another great example of this is that trainer outside of Goldenrod City who uses a Bulbasaur. It was a new game in a new region, with new Pokemon, why were they secondary to the old ones?
Because it was a sequel, and they didn’t want to take away the Pokemon that everyone had grown to love. Though Generation’s 3 and 4 did do what GS should’ve done; focus on the new Pokemon, and region.
But again, that’s because they weren’t sequels.

That's all I have at the moment, but I just wanted to post this, so people can see why I'm against HGSS being complete carbon copy of GS.

Why should I or anyone else play a shitty game a second time?

Everyone else, go ahead and post the other reasons GS was underwhelming.

And please. If you didn't actually play the game, don't post.

I don't want this to be a flame war, I just want people to see where I'm coming from.
 
lol...this isnt going to be a popular idea im guessing :p
 
haha i agree with a lot of your points, but I still loved them! :)
 
the New Pokemon Were better Though. GSC was the generation where Heracross and Scizor were given to the people.

I'll admit, some of my liking it was the fact that i was seven and my older brother liked it, therefore i liked it. i still like it, i enjoy more than the others, but its still lacking. i'm just hoping they monopolize upon the skeleton of last time
 
the New Pokemon Were better Though. GSC was the generation where Heracross and Scizor were given to the people.

I'll admit, some of my liking it was the fact that i was seven and my older brother liked it, therefore i liked it. i still like it, i enjoy more than the others, but its still lacking. i'm just hoping they monopolize upon the skeleton of last time

Yeah, The Jouto pokemon are most of my favorites so far.
UMBREON AND HOUNDOOM DTW!!

Like I said, Jouto was shit, but I still love it <3

I'll admit, some of my liking it was the fact that i was seven and my older brother liked it, therefore i liked it. i still like it, i enjoy more than the others, but its still lacking. i'm just hoping they monopolize upon the skeleton of last time

Exactly.
 
Probably not, but I'm sick of people bitching about GSC being "THE GREATEST GENERATION EVAR" and HEARTGOLD AND SOULSILVER BET' NOT CHANGE ONE SINGLE THING!!"

im not sure thats bitching, i just think people have really fond memories of gold and silver, and would like them in a new, better format :)

i personally really liked silver, i think that the improvements made it a lot better than gen 1, and the fact that they were a sequel was done really well, with the mystery of giovanni and returning to kanto :)

and i LOVE the new pokemon
lugia, sneasel, typhlosion, ampharos

ah, it was amazing :) i was there the day it cam eout :)
 
I'm not sure that's bitching, I just think people have really fond memories of gold and silver, and would like them in a new, better format :)

I personally really liked silver, i think that the improvements made it a lot better than gen 1, and the fact that they were a sequel was done really well, with the mystery of Giovanni and returning to Kanto :)

and i LOVE the new Pokemon
Lugia, Sneasel, Typhlosion, Ampharos

Ah, It was amazing :) I was there the day it came out :)

No, no, I think you're missing my point. It's not that the games were bad and I disliked them. The games were bad, and I was IN LOVE with them. Nearly everyone was!! ( A lot of people still are)

The problem is that, the games were bad, and a sizable amount of people want the games to STAY bad, becuase they don't want any (non-aesthetic) changes to be made to HeartGold and SoulSilver.

Let it be known that I've been waiting for GS remakes since FireRed and LeafGreen were announced. So, I want the remakes, but I want the remakes to rectify ALL of the issues and problems that plagued the original Gold and Silver Versions.
 
I don't get it. the games were bad but you loved them that way...so why would you not want them the same?
 
I preferred the 3rd generation. It had almost everything I wanted that wasn't in the 1st and 2nd gens. I honestly don't see why second is the favorite, it wasn't all that innovative from the originals. Not that I mind that Pokemon recycles itself over and over again, but the 2nd gen games were as you said 'Kanto's second coming'. 4th was great too.

I can't agree with the gym leaders complaint because of the double amount of gym leaders. However, the complaint about the Elite 4 I totally agree with. They really should have been second only to Blue and Red if anyone at all, but the Kanto gym leaders outclassed them even...

There was a 3 year difference between the games, and considering how they reused Kanto and hardly tried to make the games that individualistic it isn't all that surprising that they finished quickly. I agree with the strategy hitting while the iron is hot, you know?

Despite all this, I am totally thrilled about a remake. I think it will really be great with all the things that have come in the generations since. My main worry is that they won't allow you access to Pokemon beyond 2nd gen till you've beat the Elite 4 or something like that. I hope they make it a blend of every regions Pokemon as long as it fits well with habitats and such. Another thing is I hope they make Team Rocket a more significant and threatening foe than a bunch of unnamed executives unable to let go.

I totally agree that they should change some, but I don't want them to stray too far from the originals, but maybe that would be better even.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't agree with you more outside of the fact that I'm desperately hoping that GameFreak is well aware of those problems too and that the vast majority will be addressed in the remakes...

My major reason for craving these remakes so much is that it gives them a chance to go back and do it properly...
 
I don't get it. the games were bad but you loved them that way...so why would you not want them the same?

I don't want to play the same bad game twice.
The games were bad the first time, and that's okay, but now it's the second time.

Look at it this way; You (and this is all hypothetical by the way, so don't take it personally) have a history test. You don't understand the material, and you fail.

The teacher forgives you, and gives you 10 days to study.

During that 10 days, you get a tutor, and excel at your history practice tests.
During that 10 days, you gained a real understanding of the material.
During those 10 days, you became a master of History.

10 days later, you take the test again, using the same answers from the first time you took the test, and you fail again. This time the teacher doesn't give you a second chance, and you're fucked over for quite some time afterward.

Why would you use the same answers that you knew were wrong on your test? You knew the answers were wrong, and you knew you could do better, and yet you CHOOSE to do the same test EXACTLY the same WRONG answers.

So, Why would you produce the same game that you knew was bad a
second time?

I couldn't agree with you more outside of the fact that I'm desperately hoping that GameFreak is well aware of those problems too and that the vast majority will be addressed in the remakes...

My major reason for craving these remakes so much is that it gives them a chance to go back and do it properly...
I'm glad that someone understands me :)

And I'm sure that they are, since they've sold billions of copies of the same game 15 times now.

Personally, I think they knew GS was shit when they released it.

I can't agree with the gym leaders complaint because of the double amount of gym leaders. However, the complaint about the Elite 4 I totally agree with. They really should have been second only to Blue and Red if anyone at all, but the Kanto gym leaders outclassed them even...

The pokemon of the Kanto leaders had levels in the 40's and 50's

My main worry is that they won't allow you access to Pokemon beyond 2nd gen till you've beat the Elite 4 or something like that.
That was a major pain in the ass in FRLG. They didn't do it in DPPt, so hopefully, they know that everyone hated that move.

I totally agree that they should change some, but I don't want them to stray too far from the originals, but maybe that would be better even.

This is exactly what I'm upset about.

If you're standing next to a pile of shit, and you step a few feet away, you can still smell it.


If you get a good 15+ feet away, chances are, you won't smell it.
 
Last edited:
But the games were shit, and I've gonna tell you why.

1. First off, They were sequels.
That doesn't really mean anything. Sequels can be good. Just look at Toy Story 2. Not the best movie ever, but it was damn good for a sequel.

2. They were rushed sequels.
While I don't have quite enough support for this claim, if you examine the GS rom you can find chuck of unused data, and quite a few unused areas.. The safari zone comes to mind here.

A lot of games have unused data. It's part of the development process. Who knows, maybe the Safari Zone will be brought back in HGSS. You don't know for sure. Besides, if you don't have any support for your claim, don't go making it.

3. Story wise, it’s Kanto’s second coming
This is partly true, since in reality the story of every game is basically the same, though at least in every other Gen. they’ve come up with a new Gang. Recycling and continuing the Rocket Gang plot had a lot of potential, but that potential went unrealized in my opinion.

4. TEE HEE, IMMA LOT STRONGER THAN YOU LEADERS!!! ;D
Another thing that could be fixed in these remakes.

5. WTF, LETTAR POGEYMANZ?
Why create Unown and a plot for them if you’re only going to [BARELY] scratch the surface?
Again, tons of potential wasted.

Something that should be included in the remakes. I'm hoping for an expanded Unown storyline myself.

6.Where are the NEW POGEYMANZ? ;^;
Another thing Nintendo could improve with HGSS. There's a lot of opportunity to do things right. I'm hoping they will that opportunity.

I plan on getting HeartGold only because I find Gen II my favorite generation. It's mostly because of nostalgia, but I find nothing wrong with reminiscing about the past. Who doesn't like looking back on the good old days? Seriously? There are other reasons too - my Gold's battery has run dry, I can't wait to see any improvements and changes they make, and it's going to be awesome riding through Johto again.

HeartGold might very well become my favorite Pokemon game, because of all the memories it will bring back.
 
Last edited:
Blogs area much ._.
 
I don't want to play the same bad game twice.
The games were bad the first time, and that's okay, but now it's the second time.

Look at it this way; You (and this is all hypothetical by the way, so don't take it personally) have a history test. You don't understand the material, and you fail.

The teacher forgives you, and gives you 10 days to study.

During that 10 days, you get a tutor, and excel at your history practice tests.
During that 10 days, you gained a real understanding of the material.
During those 10 days, you became a master of History.

10 days later, you take the test again, using the same answers from the first time you took the test, and you fail again. This time the teacher doesn't give you a second chance, and you're fucked over for quite some time afterward.

Why would you use the same answers that you knew were wrong on your test? You knew the answers were wrong, and you knew you could do better, and yet you CHOOSE to do the same test EXACTLY the same WRONG answers.

So, Why would you produce the same game that you knew was bad a
second time?


I'm glad that someone understands me :)

And I'm sure that they are, since they've sold billions of copies of the same game 15 times now.

Personally, I think they knew GS was shit when they released it.

I see what you mean. There were a lot of hardware limitations too though. It's not like they didn't improve a lot more when they stepped up for another generation.
 
:S why are the games bad?
i think they were amazing! they were so much more technologically advanced than the old ones, better pokemon, two worlds not just one, a really good plot, they were amazing games :)
 
First: Doug is awesome.

On-topic: I really loved the games when they came out, like I have all of them...but when I went back to play them recently, my very major thoughts were "these movesets suck" and, later, "this just kinda sucks in general". That pretty much sums up the whole game: it was good for its time, but we've moved on, and the depth of the game's world and the depth of battle strategy have both increased dramatically. It's an even wider gap now than the gap between RBY and FRLG, because there was so little advancement between Gens. I and II, and so much between Gens. III and IV. The massive suck isn't just limited to GSC - RBY suffered from it as well, and while FRLG largely remedied it, even they seem shallow now. RSE have held up better than FRLG, but soon enough we'll look back on them and think "how did we ever put up with that?" about a lot of aspects of it - and we're already doing that with things like type-dependent physical/special definitions.

Nostalgia is great, but it's great because our memories are imperfect, and colored more by our feelings at the time than by the actual quality of the things we're nostalgic about. When you actually go back and revisit something you're nostalgic about, it never lives up to what you remember - FRLG suffered from this even with the addition of the Sevii Islands and other features, because the part of the game spent getting to those features was almost exactly the same as before.

HGSS needs to stay in Johto, focus on Gen. II Pokémon, and preserve the main points of the storyline; but beyond that, Game Freak needs to treat these games as if they're starting from scratch. As long as those three core things (region, Pokémon, and basic story) are there, we'll feel the warm, fuzzy nostalgia no matter what else happens - and if the rest is new and surprising to newcomers and longtime fans alike, the games will be so much more satisfying.
 
I don't get the problem with people considering Generation II the best. It's all opinion- one person's best generation is another person's shit generation. For example, I can't stand when Generation I fanboys think the original 151 Pokemon were flawless works of God. However, I simply let them be and move on.

Yes Gen. II did have flaws but that doesn't mean they won't be fixed in the remakes. In fact that's one of the reasons why I support this. I replayed Silver (Gold copy died on me) and it really wasn't as exciting. Johto will always hold a special place in my heart in terms of concept alone. The region was very interesting to me(in my opinion), from the gym leaders to the Pokemon themselves. There were things that kept G/S/C back from reaching it's full potential. Yet for some reason I'm hopeful the remakes will push said potential further.

Can't we all wait until more information comes pouring in to make judgements? Both sides of the argument are giving me migraines.
 
I totally agree with you. Silver is actually what killed off my interest in the series, and it didn't revive until FireRed - while Hoenn had lots of awesome ideas, I didn't like the idea of possibly permanently retiring Pokemon. After FRLG assured me that wouldn't happen, I tried Sapphire. The progress made from GSC to RSEFRLG when compared to RBY's jump to GSC is like comparing an elephant to a ladybug.

The story was awful, the difficulty was laughable for every single thing in the game EXCEPT Red, the whole thing focused on Kanto only to find out it was incomplete when you finally got there, the Gen II Pokemon were mostly non-evolvers that were unobtainable until far too late in Johto, and overall the games were halfassed.
 
and overall the games were halfassed.

You could attribute it to the "difficult second album" curse - so much was expected and it piled on the pressure. The fact that the games were rushed and were ahead of their time hardware wise meant so much got squashed down or cut and it shows a lot. Plus, even though G/S was the 3rd go they'd had at these games by then (R/G, then Blue, then Yellow), they were still relatively inexperienced with Gameboy development. When you fast-forward to today, where they are at the front of DS development and were leading the way with GBA development as best they could previously (alas GBA Wireless Adaptor - they did try...), it would be utterly insane not to take advantage of this wealth of new experience and talent to put right some of their youth's wrongs...

The hardware's better, the team is better and the Pokemon games themselves are better. There probably couldn't be a better time for them to revisit G/S and get it right this time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom