Hee hee, I found a mix-up

[The Pig King]

Whoever does question of the week said,and I quote,"If it has Ash and Pikachu in it,it's still Pokemon."Does this mean Chronicles ISN'T Pokemon?

 

[Dratini927]

What?

 

[Trevenant]

He's taking the quotation and making it mean "It's only Pokemon IF it has Ash and Pikachu in it." That's wrong. It's "If it has Ash and Pikachu THEN it is definitely Pokemon." which essentially means that if Ash and Pikachu are in it, you know it's Pokemon. What it does not imply is that a lack of Ash and Pikachu makes something not Pokemon. That's just silly. Chronicles is clearly Pokemon by the nature of its very name "Pokemon Chronicles". How could it not be Pokemon with a title like that?

 

[Petey]

Chronicles is indirectly related to Satoshi and Pikachu in the nature that it is a presentation of the side-quests of the people they met; therefore it is still Pokémon. XD
Well, anyways Pokémon will no longer stay Pokémon if they shove Satoshi into chronicles, which is impossible. LoL;

 

[Dratini927]

Yeah it's just side-quests, heh. I can't remember what was said in the cast, but it was just probably something that wasn't a direct statement, or had loopholes in it. In any case, we all know what he meant when he said it.