How often do you edit Bulbapedia?

How often do you edit Bulbapedia?


  • Total voters
    33
It used to be around thrice every two days (1.5 edits a day doesn't make sense), then I left. Now it's thrice every two months.
 
I only edit when I feel I have something of use to add, which totals up to very few times this year :p
 
I used to edit it pretty frequently. But then I found out that everything the administrators say is the truth, no matter how wrong it is, so I stopped editing it (I mean come on, everyone but colourblind Sketch and colourblind Kenji-girl can see that Angie's eyes are brown),. And when I wanted to start again, I found out that they approved of the most fucked up rule ever, which someting about notability which prevents lot's of articles from being made, which messed up bulbapedia even more.

Actually, the only thing I edit there is my own type chart (link can be found in my signature)
 
My schedule now is that some days I work practically from dawn to dusk, and other days I don't have a single thing to do... So on days when I'm home I edit tons.


Now, to the esteemed Mr. mijzelffan whose color-seeing eyes far surpass everyone else's: Notability Policies have a purpose. They're there, as Deth put it, to prevent flooding the 'pedia with tiny, crappy little articles. Now just a couple of days ago I [bp=User:ElectAbuzzzz/Quality]wrote something up just to explain the situation to users like you[/bp], who don't understand why we don't have separated articles for each of Ash's toes. Please (sarcasm aside), read it. If you read that whole thing and you still think we need to have an article on Drew's Absol, talk to me.
 
the Notability Policy. its a great policy that prevents a flood of useless articles from being made. remember, quality, not quantity.

maybe it would be if it was done on a smaller scale, but this is too much. I think Rivals' and recurring characters' pokémon are notable enough for their own article. but what do I know, I'm "just a normal member", instead of a "superior administrator, who are always right".

Thank god things are better done here at the forums ^^

Now, to the esteemed Mr. mijzelffan whose color-seeing eyes far surpass everyone else's: Notability Policies have a purpose. They're there, as Deth put it, to prevent flooding the 'pedia with tiny, crappy little articles. Now just a couple of days ago I [bp=User:ElectAbuzzzz/Quality]wrote something up just to explain the situation to users like you[/bp], who don't understand why we don't have separated articles for each of Ash's toes. Please (sarcasm aside), read it. If you read that whole thing and you still think we need to have an article on Drew's Absol, talk to me.

read it, and think it's ok that you don't allow CoD's pokémon pages. Even Gym leaders I can understand (they even appear once). But rivals are different, because they appear multiple times, and I think all of their main pokémon (even if they appeared only once) should get a place (paul's azumaril never was one of his main pokémon as far as we know). but what do I know, I'm "just a normal member", instead of a "superior administrator, who are always right".
 
Last edited:
Since I've recently joined Bulbapedia, I haven't gotten a chance to edit so I voted 'Never'
 
i voted never since i've only edited bulbapedia once, and that was a long time ago. i was writing about how to properly stir the poffin mix and what would happen if you were too slow/too fast ;o
 
I never edit Bulbapedia. I don't even have an account there.
 
I just de-stubbed the Galen article. I edit Wikipedia and HP Wiki all the time though, it's just so damn easy. With BP, I have to hit back and forward randomly till it admits I'm logged in, then if I take too long to type, I hit save and it says it's limited to users only. 0_0 I am! It takes me back to the view source a lot.
 
Back
Top Bottom