The Outrage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2007
- Messages
- 13,731
- Reaction score
- 1,775
I was quite pleased with the announcement of sequels, rather than a traditional third version, due to the rigid nature of the fandom. Speculation stopped being speculation, but merely "they did this before so therefore..." type conversations. Even now, when I look at people speculating on B2W2, some resort to wanting fake scans to speculate on real things, as if that's any different from free speculation. Really, are we unable to think for ourselves now?
And that's why I want to bring this topic back up again:
What do you guys think of a non-traditional set-up to the main series game?
So what are your thoughts on this? How do you want future games to be set up?
And that's why I want to bring this topic back up again:
What do you guys think of a non-traditional set-up to the main series game?
I've gotten some interesting comments on my blog, particularly with regards to Chugoku and Shikoku. Maybe some people have given up on returning to Japan, but I doubt its the end we'll see of it, and these two regions provide an interesting set-up. Being geographically separate regions in real life, it allows for some of my suggestions in my blog and that thread, particularly, having two main versions that have separate (but related) stories.
This wouldn't be the first time we've seen different sides of the same story, as this was first done with Team Aqua and Magma. Emerald united those two stories, but what I propose is that one version start with Chugoku and the other version starts with Shikoku and will eventualyl allow you to travel between both areas. Each game will play independently of each other, but has an overarching plot, but told from different perspectives. It's a new way to tell a story, and would allow us to get more depth in the plot without bogging a single game with too many details.
I think this would also solve another problem this franchise has: useless opposite-gender characters. Ever since the option was created, choosing one gender either causes one to disappear entirely, or to stay in the side-lines. However, having two versions telling the same story from different perspectives allows for both gender counterparts to play a prominent role, by having the opposite gender counterpart to play the story you didn't choose.
Another interesting prospect with this set-up is that it allows for the plots to combine within the same games. In the LoZ:Oracle games, this was achieved through passwords, but Pokémon has been combining data through record mixing for a long time. Consider this however, if DLC becomes prominent, what if they allow for DLC to extend the post-game plot, but how the plot progresses in the DLC will depend on which game you choose to link with?
And finally, everyone complains that Game Freak and Nintendo are forcing you to buy the same games over and over. This time they'd be sufficiently different that it would be worth your cash to do so.Though, I wouldn't be surprised if people reacted negatively, given that a good portion of the fandom would rather have bought the same game twice (i.e. a third version) rather than a sequel
This wouldn't be the first time we've seen different sides of the same story, as this was first done with Team Aqua and Magma. Emerald united those two stories, but what I propose is that one version start with Chugoku and the other version starts with Shikoku and will eventualyl allow you to travel between both areas. Each game will play independently of each other, but has an overarching plot, but told from different perspectives. It's a new way to tell a story, and would allow us to get more depth in the plot without bogging a single game with too many details.
I think this would also solve another problem this franchise has: useless opposite-gender characters. Ever since the option was created, choosing one gender either causes one to disappear entirely, or to stay in the side-lines. However, having two versions telling the same story from different perspectives allows for both gender counterparts to play a prominent role, by having the opposite gender counterpart to play the story you didn't choose.
Another interesting prospect with this set-up is that it allows for the plots to combine within the same games. In the LoZ:Oracle games, this was achieved through passwords, but Pokémon has been combining data through record mixing for a long time. Consider this however, if DLC becomes prominent, what if they allow for DLC to extend the post-game plot, but how the plot progresses in the DLC will depend on which game you choose to link with?
And finally, everyone complains that Game Freak and Nintendo are forcing you to buy the same games over and over. This time they'd be sufficiently different that it would be worth your cash to do so.
So what are your thoughts on this? How do you want future games to be set up?
Last edited: