Kenji-girl
Tracey's #1 fangirl
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 0
Okay, restrictions on images are getting ridiculous now. If it's not PNG, users like Sketch automatically label it as bad even though the picture is of perfect quality.
This is stupid. The picture should be labeled bad ONLY if the quality is below average. ex: low pixel count, logos, static, bad scans, etc...
Also some users are being threatened to be banned from the archives for uploading JPG images, in which their only flaw is being in JPG. Right now, it is preferred, not required, and we shouldn't be threatening banishment to users who are just trying to find pictures to add to the articles. What if they don't know how to turn the pictures into PNG? If we hate JPGs so much, we should make it so users are unable to upload them and make PNG the only available format for still images.
Most of the images are thumb nailed anyway. It's impossible to tell the difference between a high quality JPG and a PNG unless you zoom in on it.
Maxim did bring up something on Seymour's page. "Bulbapedia is being really bitchy about images", and I couldn't agree with him more. Bad images should only be the ones listed in my examples, not JPGs.
This is stupid. The picture should be labeled bad ONLY if the quality is below average. ex: low pixel count, logos, static, bad scans, etc...
Also some users are being threatened to be banned from the archives for uploading JPG images, in which their only flaw is being in JPG. Right now, it is preferred, not required, and we shouldn't be threatening banishment to users who are just trying to find pictures to add to the articles. What if they don't know how to turn the pictures into PNG? If we hate JPGs so much, we should make it so users are unable to upload them and make PNG the only available format for still images.
Most of the images are thumb nailed anyway. It's impossible to tell the difference between a high quality JPG and a PNG unless you zoom in on it.
Maxim did bring up something on Seymour's page. "Bulbapedia is being really bitchy about images", and I couldn't agree with him more. Bad images should only be the ones listed in my examples, not JPGs.
