• A reminder that Forum Moderator applications are currently still open! If you're interested in joining an active team of moderators for one of the biggest Pokémon forums on the internet, click here for info.
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

New Video and New Official Site

There is one new thing apparently. If you order both Diamond and Pearl (Or as the site also demonstrates, if you've gone off your rocker and want 2 Diamonds or 2 Pearls) you get the Diaruga/Parukia figures AND the third one (The starters one).

Funky.
 
This is like what they did for Ranger. Not only does Pokemon.com have a Ranger section, but so does Nintendo.com. Just like then, however, Nintendo's pages did not appear until close to release. They usually put up the same updates as Pokemon.com does, it's just organized differently.
 
Sceptile726 said:
This is like what they did for Ranger. Not only does Pokemon.com have a Ranger section, but so does Nintendo.com. Just like then, however, Nintendo's pages did not appear until close to release.
Click to expand...

Uh... they've done that for every game. The official Nintendo site always has a subsite for the latest first and second party games.
 
I thought so, it's just Ranger was the only example I knew of. :p
 
Doctor Oak said:
Uh... they've done that for every game. The official Nintendo site always has a subsite for the latest first and second party games.
Click to expand...

Second party? You mean the player develops games too? You must mean third party.
 
No.

Second party developers are companies that develop for Nintendo systems and are published by Nintendo but are autonomous companies.

Gamefreak is one of them.
 
^^^ It seems like less even... which is normal for the nintendo site..

hmmm... I thought Gamefreak was first, like Retro. Nintendo owns 100% of the company.
 
bell02 alpha said:
^^^ It seems like less even... which is normal for the nintendo site..

hmmm... I thought Gamefreak was first, like Retro. Nintendo owns 100% of the company.
Click to expand...

If Nintendo owned 100% of the company, it would be called Nintendo.

Also, Nintendo doesn't own 100% of Nintendo.

They don't, however, have a controlling share in Gamefreak. As far as I'm aware, it's rather likely Tajiri himself that has that.
 
Please note: The thread is from 18 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom