Old pokemon stats

antiphlox

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
so how exactly do i look up level info and TM/hm info for certain pokemnon in older generations? cause as far as i can see, i can only see the atttacks and stuff for the current generation. How exactly do i or can i even veiw it for previous generations?
 
We don't have to do that every time someone gets confused by something, TTE. Unless there have been other complaints about this sort of thing, in which case we may want to do something after all.
 
Eh, I just get kind of frustrated when my shiny and roundy templates are called tl;dr.
 
We seriously need to get that wicked coding which hides the current text and shows another with the click of a button. Too bad you need HTML for that.
 
When and if we get that implemented, I'd say we should then move the learnlists themselves to separate subpages of the main Pokémon page and just include those pages as the coding dividers, rather than, as we had before, a mile-long coding list of all the moves learnable across all four generations.
 
I mean further divide them (Gen I/Level, Gen I/TM, Gen II/Level, etc.) so that we could make it so that we don't have a five-mile list of coding and to make it easier, if something needs to be changed, to change it.
 
Well, you'd have to navigate to the transcluded page first in order to edit it... but I can see how that would work. It sounds good, and I definitely like it better than having to go to a separate page to look at that info.
 
Since it'd be done like a template ({{Bulbasaur (Pokémon)/Gen I/Level}}) it'd just be as simple as clicking on it in the edit summary like you can for templates.

However, it would mean a total overhaul of the system we have now... same parameters so no need to change anything, but a hell of a lot of change needed for the actual boxes' coding.
 
How so? We could just move the coding wholesale to the new pages and then transclude them as templates, right? And, since the answer is likely no, why not?
 
Please note: The thread is from 17 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom