• A reminder that Forum Moderator applications are currently still open! If you're interested in joining an active team of moderators for one of the biggest Pokémon forums on the internet, click here for info.
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Review PK17: Pikachu's Island Adventure

Argy

∠(>w<) #634
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
3,907
Reaction score
9
Japanese: ピカチュウのわんぱくアイランド Pikachu's Island of Mischief
Japanese movie site

This ANA special is on the English ninth movie DVD, which came out April 3 in America. It will be released on DVD in Japan on June 22, 2007. [HASHTAG]#PocketMonsters[/HASHTAG] has a torrent link and pictures up on its site.

--

I thought the animation was sub-par, and the absence of [bp=Ash's Sceptile]Jukain[/bp], [bp=Brock's Forretress]Foretos[/bp], and [bp=Ash's Swellow]Ohsubame[/bp] was kind of lame. The narrator (the usual TV series one) used the same voice for all the Pokémon, so sometimes it was hard to distinguish between Pokémon. I want to see the Japanese version now.

Most of the time when the narrator said "Buizel," it sounded like "weasel." I think if someone didn't know the Pokémon's name, he or she would think it was simply named after the animal.
 
And, according to credits, it weren't dubbed by TAJ. Instead company called DuArt Film and Video worked on this. That's strange.
 
The narrator (the usual TV series one) used the same voice for all the Pokémon, so sometimes it was hard to distinguish between Pokémon.
Both narrators have that problem. That's why I'm glad 4Kids didn't do the same with Mike Pollock when dubbing the Pichu Brother hosos.
 
Bad. The horrible narration in particular made this painful to watch.

Only redeeming qualities were Buizel, Chatot and Cowboy Meowth...
 
Please note: The thread is from 18 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom