Platinum New pokemon forms

W

WMS

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
i dident see a thread on this about giratina, shaymins,and rotoms new slick looks here we can talk about them as for me Giratina's new form looks like it eats baby pokemon, and shaymins looks sortoff rushed and rotom looks made up on the spot. so what do you guys think?
 
I love Shaymin Sky/Land Formes :D
Giratina's Origin is appealing too.
However I havent caught Rotom yet in Platinum to actually use its formes.
 
I think you need an event or something to use its forms, don't you? I don't have Platinum yet (or speak Japanese... =P) so I don't know through personal experience but I heard you need an event item to make it change forms.

Also, yes, Giratina is pretty damn awesome in its new form. Shaymin Sky Form is also much better than its Land form, which I always thought was a terrible excuse for a legendary Pokemon, especially an event exclusive one.
 
Giratina's Origin forme item is ingame. The other ones are activated in an event.
 
Gastlys Mama said:
I think you need an event or something to use its forms, don't you? I don't have Platinum yet (or speak Japanese... =P) so I don't know through personal experience but I heard you need an event item to make it change forms.
ya you do its the platinum orb (Serebii.net for source) anyway it is powerful do you think it will be any stronger then all legendaries or just as strong

and i heard that Shaymins sky forme was faster then a legendary dog which would be useful
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
xD thats very true but hopefully it helps it to strike firs and at least learn recover right? am i right?... anyway i think Giratina would proove useful to my team inthe ghost department cuase my Gengare isent working out with that said i still need money for platinum which is a problem but back on subject... how useful do you think the rotom forms will be or are they just there to be there?
 
I like the rotom forms much. They're like evolutions stat-like.
 
Please note: The thread is from 17 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom