• Our spoiler embargo for the non-DLC content for Pokémon Legends: Z-A is now lifted! Feel free to discuss the game freely across the site without the need of spoiler tabs, and use content from the game within your profiles!

Professor Oak Battle

Should Oak have been fought in later Generations?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 10 66.7%

  • No.

    Votes: 3 20.0%

  • Yes, but with a more varied team.

    Votes: 2 13.3%

  • No, we have enough strong trainers already.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    15
Master Yiseeks

Master Yiseeks

The One True Carry
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
0
Has anyone here managed to fight him in Gen I? I did it using the Ditto glitch. For those that don't know what I'm talking about, Professor Oak was supposedly going to be an opponent in the First gen, but was taken out. Going by his levels, he would've been either a champion, or bonus boss like Cynthia. His team is made up of Tauros, Gyarados, Exeggutor, Arcanine, and whichever starter you and your Rival didn't choose.
 
I believe there was speculation of having to battle him after completing the Pokedex or beating the Elite 4 the second time. Judging by the levels this would also make sense.
 
I... have never heard of such thing before.

But tell us, how was the experience of fighting the Okido Hakase?
 
I've never battled oak! I want to.... I want to battle his Charizard... (remember pokemon 4ever Sammy (Oak) had a charmeleon, so now it MUST be charizard! After 20 years YES!)
 
It was epic. The glitch relies on the special attack stat of the last pokemon you faced. The one I did got me a Oak with a Blastoise and the pokemon mentioned above. His pokemon were pretty strong, but their movesets were a bit...lacking.
 
wow, never knew you could do this. they should have added it to the game
 
Please note: The thread is from 13 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom