President Barack Obama's plans are "one big down payment on a new American socialist experiment," says one top Republican. He's "the world's best salesman of socialism," says another.
"Lenin and Stalin would love this stuff," declares Mike Huckabee, one-time Republican presidential candidate.
Fox News personality Sean Hannity derides his agenda as "socialism you can believe in," while his colleague in cacophonous conservative punditry, Rush Limbaugh, is unapologetic about publicly declaring his desire for Obama to fail: "Why would I want socialism to succeed?"
Less than two months into Obama's presidency, Republicans and their conservative supporters have unsheathed a new weapon in their battle against a commander-in-chief who continues to vex them with strong public approval ratings in the midst of a devastating recession.
They are routinely referring to the global economic downturn as the "Obama recession" while frequently accusing him of being a socialist in his efforts to jump-start the nation's economy.
It's an epithet that has raised the hackles of the president himself.
In an interview last week with the New York Times, Obama was asked if he's a socialist. An apparently incredulous president initially laughed the question off, then called the reporters back after the interview was over.
"It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question," Obama told the Times.
"I did think it might be useful to point out that it wasn't under me that we started buying a bunch of shares of banks ... we've actually been operating in a way that has been entirely consistent with free-market principles, and some of the same folks who are throwing the word socialist around can't say the same."
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, one of the few Republicans in Obama's cabinet, lashed out at the accusations in an interview with the Huffington Post this week.
If anyone's to blame for the current recession, LaHood said, it's the previous occupant of the White House, George W. Bush.
"This is not an Obama recession," LaHood said. "He inherited all of this. He inherited a US$1 trillion dollar debt. He inherited the recession. He inherited the lousy stock market. All of this was inherited."
In fact, said LaHood, the president has been hard at work trying to repair the damage done by his Republican predecessors whose refusal to regulate the country's financial institutions, in particular, contributed mightily to the recession.
"The guy has been in office a little over a month and what he has tried to do is listen to every economist he could listen to. And he put in place some opportunities to get people to work quickly through the transportation bill portion of it, to help the banks, and to help the real estate industry. And it is going to take time."
Nonetheless, Republicans are showing no signs of letting up, taking to the airwaves to press their case that Obama is leading the country down a dangerously socialist path of big government control.
Mike Pence, a Republican congressman from Indiana, had this to say this week about Obama's budget: "You look what he has in mind for health care, you look at what he has in mind in terms of an enormous increase in taxes on virtually every American, energy taxes on every homeowner and renter, a micro-management of our economy in so many different ways."
"As much as the president might bristle about the term ... it's really hard to argue that this isn't a fundamental transformation of our economy to look more like European-style socialism," Pence concluded.
If so, it's a brand of socialism Americans are behind.
Countless public opinion polls suggest that the majority of Americans support both additional stimulus spending as well as government intervention to save insolvent banks.
Even the socialists are scoffing at the suggestion that Obama's a socialist.
"Expanding welfare? Only a traitorous Red could be in favour of such a measure as unemployment soars to its highest level since 1982," reads a sarcastic editorial in the Socialist Worker published Wednesday.
"A government-led expansion of health care? Every patriotic American knows that if 50 million people in the U.S. lack health insurance, it's because they don't appreciate how the free-market system works."
Obama, in fact, is in danger of not going far enough to pull the economy out of its freefall, the publication argued.
"With the government's own statistics showing the economy lurching deeper into crisis by the week, the question isn't whether Obama is too radical, but not radical enough."
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090311/world/obama_s_word