Robots Take Center Stage in U.S. War in Afghanistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

GrnMarvl14

Lying
Joined
Jan 4, 2003
Messages
13,846
Reaction score
4
Source.

2_21_031809_bigdog4.jpg


The U.S. military is calling out the "BigDogs" in addition to its big guns as it deploys more troops to fight terrorists in Afghanistan.

The BigDogs — four-legged robots that can navigate the country's treacherous terrain — and pilotless helicopters than can transport tons of supplies to very remote bases are just two of the new weapons being tested in Afghanistan.

The war zone is increasingly becoming a development laboratory for machines that don't eat, sleep, polish their boots or suffer casualties. But can they succeed where man struggles?

It takes a moment for the senses even to comprehend BigDog, a four-legged robot that vaguely resembles a headless pack animal.

The machine's creator, Boston Dynamics, has a motto — “dedicated to the way things move” — and that’s precisely what is both jarring and fascinating about its invention. Using a gasoline engine that emits an eerie lawnmower buzz, BigDog has animal-inspired articulated legs that absorb shock and recycle kinetic energy from one step to the next.

Its robot brain, a sophisticated computer, controls locomotion sensors that adapt rapidly to the environment. The entire control system regulates, steers and navigates ground contact. A laser gyroscope keeps BigDog on his metal paws — even when the robot slips, stumbles or is kicked over.

Boston Dynamics says BigDog can run as fast as 4 miles per hour, walk slowly, lie down and climb slopes up to 35 degrees. BigDog's heightened sense can also survey the surrounding terrain and become alert to potential danger.

All told, the BigDog bears an uncanny resemblance to a living organic animal and not what it really is: A metal exo-skeleton moved by a hydraulic actuation system designed to carry over 300 pounds of equipment over ice, sand and rocky mountainsides.

So much for the ground war. With IED attacks in Afghanistan increasing on land, air transportation has become a major focus for the military.

Routine helicopter flights operating 24 hours a day, year round, are crucial for the American mission. The Marine Corps has recently called for unmanned cargo flights to carry essentials to isolated areas that can be reached only by air.

Enter the K-MAX, a remote-controlled helicopter designed to transport heavy loads — even in Afghanistan's high altitudes.

The K-MAX's unique rotor design — two intermeshed rotors turning in opposite directions and slightly angled to prevent the blades from colliding — give this unmanned aircraft a distinct advantage.

“All the energy goes into the lift and eliminates the need for the tail rotor,” said Frans Jurgens, spokesman for Lockheed Martin Systems Integration, which has partnered with Kaman Aerospace Corp. to manufacture the unmanned K-MAX aircraft.
.

The design enables the relatively small chopper to tow up to 6,000 pounds. “The K-MAX is basically an aerial truck,” Jurgens said.

A ground controller “pilots” the unmanned aircraft using a “digital tablet” — a portable device the size of a clipboard attached to a backpack. The controller has visual contact with the aircraft during takeoff and can see where the K-MAX is going through a camera attached to the unmanned helicopter.

Unlike other unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), the K-MAX currently requires some visual contact — ground controllers to launch and retrieve the aircraft.

During a flight, K-MAX's “autonomous flight brain” calculates the best route to its destination and can automatically re-route itself should an area be designated a “no-fly” zone.

After launch, control transfers to a second ground controller waiting at the point of capture. Once the K-MAX has been sighted, the destination controller discharges the cargo by remote command.

But some in the military remain skeptical that a robot and a distant operator can replace a skilled pilot.

“When you’re dealing with a small area and a very small margin of error, mountains, temperatures, and other factors like heavy unpredictable winds, it’s hard to believe unmanned flights could account for all the variables,” Chief Warrant Officer Timothy Smail, a pilot from Eagle Lift, the 7th battallion 101st Aviation Regiment, told FOXNews.com in a phone interview from Afghanistan.

“Everything those troops have we’re responsible for bringing,” Smail said. “Not saying it can’t be done, I would just be skeptical.”

After two tours in Iraq, Smail is serving a second tour in Afghanistan, which he says is the “most difficult place to pilot in the world.”

But, Jurgens is not concerned.

“The K-MAX will fly repetitive flights that can be predictably programmed,” he said. “Given the fact that traveling by ground convoy is not the preferred transportation, unmanned cargo flights can save pilots from routine unnecessary exposure.”

KMAX has never been deployed to a war zone, but the unmanned aircraft has been a robotic workhorse in the logging industry, where it transfers heavy loads at high altitudes. It has also been used to transport water to fight forest fires.

They'll never fully replace actual people, but robots and unmanned vehicles will spare soldiers from routine tasks and enable them to focus their experience and skills on missions that require the human touch.
Click to expand...

I HAD to throw that picture up. It's cool that we're using more robots, but am I the only one freaked out by that thing? Reminds me of the Wheelers from Return to Oz.
 
Actually, I think the Bush administration was working on a larger prototype before funding was canned and Obama took office. Something about new age Republic Imperialism or something or other ...

picture.php
 
It's definitely freakish.

Can someone techy explain to me what "recycling Kinetic energy" actually means? Sounds to me like a salesman way of saying "Momentum".
 
_fire_breathing_jumping_spider_robot_4.jpg

I see your BigDog robot and raise you a fire-breathing spider robot. Don't know if it's being used in Iraq, but it's still cool.
 
Æsahættr said:
It's definitely freakish.

Can someone techy explain to me what "recycling Kinetic energy" actually means? Sounds to me like a salesman way of saying "Momentum".
Click to expand...

I think it means storing up that Kinetic energy with Potential Energy for later use. Once you release that Potential Energy, it becomes Kinetic Energy while it has probably already built up that Momentum. I can't really explain the momentum part as well as the Kinetic and Potential Energy, but however ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED
 
Well, robots are used in saving lives, so why not use robots to take them?
 
Mr. Flapjack said:
I think it means storing up that Kinetic energy with Potential Energy for later use. Once you release that Potential Energy, it becomes Kinetic Energy while it has probably already built up that Momentum. I can't really explain the momentum part as well as the Kinetic and Potential Energy, but however ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED
Click to expand...

Momentum is kinetic energy that has carried over from a previous application of force which has not yet dissipated. In other words, left over kinetic is being put to good use instead of wasted. In other words, recycled. I already knew all of what you said, I just thought there may have been a more "hi-tech" meaning to "recycling kinetic energy".
 
Æsahættr said:
Momentum is kinetic energy that has carried over from a previous application of force which has not yet dissipated. In other words, left over kinetic is being put to good use instead of wasted. In other words, recycled. I already knew all of what you said, I just thought there may have been a more "hi-tech" meaning to "recycling kinetic energy".
Click to expand...

If you save up all that kinetic energy with potential energy, then you'd be sure to go far in the kinetics and in the world of Physics. You couldn't break the law of physics if you even attempted.
 
I said nothing about breaking the laws of physics. Your post makes no sense.

I merely said that "recycling kinetic energy" and "momentum" to me seem like the exact same thing, and I wanted to know if I whether or not I was right.
 
Æsahættr said:
I merely said that "recycling kinetic energy" and "momentum" to me seem like the exact same thing, and I wanted to know if I whether or not I was right.
Click to expand...

I believe so. I know that in Formula One, a new technology has been introduced this year called KERS - Kinetic Energy Recovery System. The idea is that the system will trap the kinetic energy from braking/wheelspin and use it to boost the straightline speed. So yes, I believe that you're right.
 
this is what its all leading up to robots whome are faster, stronger, smarter and think we are inferior and as such must be destroyed
attachment.php

robot Apocalypse here we come
 
Wow. Quadrapedal robots on the battlefield? What next, Gekko? Nanomachines? Mobile suits?

Let's just hope technology doesn't advance faster than humanity.
 
Knux said:
Wow. Quadrapedal robots on the battlefield? What next, Gekko? Nanomachines? Mobile suits?

Let's just hope technology doesn't advance faster than humanity.
Click to expand...

They're pretty close on the last two.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom