SharKing's Battle Tower Team

SharKing

I won't bite... much.
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
3,794
Reaction score
14
I'm raising a team for the Battle Tower. Here's my plans.

セミヤカ (Semiyaka) (Ninjask)
Adamant / Focus Sash / Speed Boost
- X-Scissor
- Aerial Ace
- Night Slash
- Swords Dance
252 Attack, 252 Speed, 6 HP

A Swords Dance sweeper. It can utilize its attacks with great power and Speed. Aerial Ace is for striking foes that abuse Double Team.

YouDie.com (Porygon-Z)
Modest / Choice Scarf / Adaptability
- Tri Attack
- Thunderbolt
- Ice Beam
- Trick
252 Sp. Attack, 252 Speed, 6 HP

My Special attacker, and Trickster. It likes to lock foes on Double Team so Semiyaka can kill 'em.

キツナイト (Kitsunaito) (Umbreon)
Impish / Leftovers / Synchronize
- Faint Attack
- Toxic
- Wish
- Protect
252 HP, 156 Defense, 102 Sp. Defense

My Toxic-staller and Wish supporter. I gave it Faint Attack because it's not abusing Curse.

That's my team. Rate away!
 
It's 24 hours before you can bump. :/ That's in forum-wide rules iirc
 
I could see the tower of hax throwing millions and millions of fighting type pokemon your way, and although you have ninjask, you have a big weakness towards fighting. (yesi get it, 4x resistance, but his paper defenses? they just use any other attack)
although i see the use of attacking ninjask. its a good plan.
 
Swords Dance Ninjask was the only reason I didn't say anything about the Fighting weakness. He'll get off a Swords Dance, their Fighting-type will use some move and knock it down to 1 HP at worst, and then wham, Aerial Ace to the face. Of course if they have another Fighting-type, especially with priority, you're completely screwed. Lucario with Mach Punch? Bye bye this team.
 
Yeah, more than one Fighting-type Pokemon may ruin me. I just threw this together. LOL
 
Please note: The thread is from 17 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom