• A reminder that Forum Moderator applications are currently still open! If you're interested in joining an active team of moderators for one of the biggest Pokémon forums on the internet, click here for info.
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Standard Moves

MTC

Registered User
Joined
Jul 8, 2004
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Should Standard Moves be listed as Learnt at Level 1 or as Standard Moves?
Its more logical to say Level 1, but most people say Standard Moves, so which should be used for the Bulbapedia?
 
Representation varies. The Smeargle article uses --. Level 0 or level 1 are both logical. List them separately from level-up moves sounds good as well.
 
Interesting. I would eliminate them as Level 1 based on Red and Blue glitches such as Missingno. that could result in L. 0 Pokemon, and plus most sites, guides, and everything else just says -- as the level of learning. I'd stick with Standard Moves.
 
It's confusing, because some Pokemon's standard moves can only be taught via the Tinymushroom/Heart Scale move tutor - Charizard having Overheat as a standard move, for instance.
 
When you go to the Heart Scale Move Tutor in Ruby and Sapphire, does he just give you a list of moves or does it say what level they're learnt at?
If it says what level, then what does it say for Standard moves?
 
"Lv. --" explains away the problems created by "lv. 1" or "lv. 0", treating them as inherently owned by the Pokemon at the time of evolution or birth. Hence why Zard can Overheat.
 
Please note: The thread is from 20 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom