• Our spoiler embargo for the non-DLC content for Pokémon Legends: Z-A is now lifted! Feel free to discuss the game freely across the forums without the need of spoiler tabs, and use content from the game within your profiles!

The Last Airbender: Racebending controversy

Status
Not open for further replies.

SmearglePaints

New Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
Well, the premiere is coming soon, on the first of next month. Things seem to have reached an apex of sorts as coverage for the film has brought up the casting controversy with most condemning it. You know that this is a little more than some fans' sniff when Roger fucking Ebert calls out the casting.

Likewise, Shyamalan seems to be really feeling the heat and has delivered a lot of new interviews on the subject, though he continually parrots the same old excuses of anime being "ambiguous" and that he's making the world of Avatar "more diverse". His most recent interview, as seen here (posted today), is simply hilarious in how personal he's taken the whole thing. Example, first question:

Q: There's been a lot of controversy regarding the casting and how all the heroes are being portrayed by Caucasian actors, while all the villains are all being portrayed by non-Caucasians. How do you respond to those who are saying that The Last Airbender is racist?

A: "Well, you caught me. I'm the face of racism. I'm always surprised at the level of misunderstanding, the sensitivities that exist. As an Asian-American, it bothers me when people take all of their passion and rightful indignation about the subject and then misplace it. Here's the reality: first of all, the Uncle Iroh character is the Yoda character in the movie, and it would be like saying that Yoda was a villain. So he's Persian."

Snippy from the get-go, Shyamalan goes on to call his race-casting of the imperialist Fire Nation from East Asian/Japanese to dark-skinned Indians "ironic" and calls anyone that suggests that this may have unfortunate implications are themselves "racist".

After trotting out the familiar spiel about anime being "ambiguous", Shyamalan explains his thought-process in casting every people other than the heroes as minorities, then explains that this logically allowed for the heroes to be white/European in the name of "diversity".

Finally, he finishes up with a little more defensive ranting, including "The irony of this statement enrages me to the point of ... not even the accusation, but the misplacement of it. You're coming at me, the one Asian filmmaker who has the right to cast anybody I want, and I'm casting this entire movie in this color blind way where everyone is represented. I even had one section of the Earth kingdom as African American, which obviously isn't in the show, but I wanted to represent them, too!", which seems to indicate that because he's an Asian (Indian) director he's immune to making unfortunate casting decisions.

While Shyamalan may seem to have every right to be defensive, he can't help but finish with this: "And again, this is what really frustrates me, when we get to the second movie (hopefully), since its based in the Earth Kingdom, suddenly the movie will seem entirely politically correct Asian, and the accusers will feel like they won. YOU DID NOT WIN! YOU DID NOT WIN! That's not what happened, you were wrong. As you can tell, it's a frustrating thing. Look at the movie poster with Dev Patel in it. I'm not understanding ... he's not politically correct?"

In the end, Shyamalan's anger seems to have gotten the better of him. Despite statements from casting director Frank Marshall that the "Caucasian or other ethnicities" casting call was a "third-party" mistake (which was later proven false from early dated in-production papers and the fact the official site used this phrasing), Shyamalan ruins the lie by saying "And here's the irony of it, this has nothing to do with the studio system. I had complete say in casting. So if you need to point the racist finger, point it at me, and if it doesn't stick, then be quiet." Combined with earlier statements where he wanted the white Nicola Peltz as Katara from the beginning, and that "no one else on the planet" could act as Aang other than Noah Ringer, it becomes obvious who the preference was under "Caucasian or any other ethnicity". Yes, Shyamalan, I think I'll point my finger at you.
 
Well, I'm not entirely happy about the whole casting, but until I see how the characters portray their anime counterparts, appearance isn't really all that important. If they capture the character, who cares? I don't want to see a carbon copy of the cartoon.
 
The show was awesome and so will this movie. I don't care about the casting. It seemed fair that the asian majority would be the Earthbenders while other mixed nationalities for the other three. M. Night's last movie, The Happening, was the only bad movie made so I have high hopes for this one.. and on 3D.
 
The show was awesome and so will this movie. I don't care about the casting. It seemed fair that the asian majority would be the Earthbenders while other mixed nationalities for the other three. M. Night's last movie, The Happening, was the only bad movie made so I have high hopes for this one.. and on 3D.
How is it "fair" to cast an entire people Asian when they aren't even in this movie? All three of the leads were changed from East Asian (Tibetan/Chinese) and Inuit to white, whereas the light-skinned, Japan-based Fire Nation were turned into dark-skinned Indians. I don't really see the fairness in this disproportionate casting.
 
How is it "fair" to cast an entire people Asian when they aren't even in this movie? All three of the leads were changed from East Asian (Tibetan/Chinese) and Inuit to white, whereas the light-skinned, Japan-based Fire Nation were turned into dark-skinned Indians. I don't really see the fairness in this disproportionate casting.

The whole world in that show were Asians. They need to add other nationalities in this movie. I understand that they casted all white leads.. it was a mistake. I still see that the film equals out if a second movie is made; with the Earth Kingdom being all Asian-based.
 
Oh lordy, here we go again.

2gx2mok.png
e67rs7.png

I mean, I can totally understand why these two were cast with white actors. I mean look at them! TOTALLY WHITE, amirite? And even if they aren't, it's not like there are billions of other Hollywood roles for white people, and barely any for dark-skinned people thanks to some ridiculous notion that white people have to be the main characters because otherwise no one will watch it. NON-WHITES CAN GET ROLES IN EVERY MOVIE EVER, AND WHITE PEOPLE ARE SUPER OPPRESSED. Why can't people understand this?

it was a mistake

You seem to be a bit confused. "Mistake" is the antonym of "on purpose" (which this casting was), not a synonym.
 
Last edited:
The whole world in that show were Asians. They need to add other nationalities in this movie. I understand that they casted all white leads.. it was a mistake. I still see that the film equals out if a second movie is made; with the Earth Kingdom being all Asian-based.
They need to add other nationalities? Why is that? Was the original show, with its portrayal of dozens of different Asian ethnicities, cultures, and mythologies not diverse enough?
 
I'm not sure why it matters what the people look like - If a black girl was cast to play Katara solely because she was black, I wouldn't be too happy. I mean, she doesn't capture who Katara is at all, but they cast her because she was black in the cartoon. That makes as little sense as what actually happened.

I'm not saying Shama-whatever didn't make some mistakes, but casting solely based on appearance or race is a silly thing to do. Of course, we have to wait for the movie to be released to say that these actors do the best job of representing their cartoon counterparts.
 
They need to add other nationalities? Why is that? Was the original show, with its portrayal of dozens of different Asian ethnicities, cultures, and mythologies not diverse enough?

The whole world isn't Asian, if you haven't noticed?
 
I'm not sure why it matters what the people look like - If a black girl was cast to play Katara solely because she was black, I wouldn't be too happy. I mean, she doesn't capture who Katara is at all, but they cast her because she was black in the cartoon. That makes as little sense as what actually happened.

I don't think you understand how casting works. For one thing, she's not black, but closer to Inuit. So, a black actress would have been a bad idea too. Second, you seem to be implying that casting a person of color automatically means that the character will be poorly acted.

The whole world isn't Asian, if you haven't noticed?

And the whole world isn't white either, but that doesn't stop practically every other movie from starring mostly whites, with nonwhites as either villains or side characters who have no actual importance to the plot.
 
I mean, I can totally understand why these two were cast with white actors. I mean look at them! TOTALLY WHITE, amirite?
They're just tanned whites!


...Yes, I've heard that before.
Custosadlookaround.gif


I'm not sure why it matters what the people look like - If a black girl was cast to play Katara solely because she was black, I wouldn't be too happy. I mean, she doesn't capture who Katara is at all, but they cast her because she was black in the cartoon. That makes as little sense as what actually happened.
Because the choice is between people of color and people who can act. :look:
 
I'm not saying Shama-whatever didn't make some mistakes, but casting solely based on appearance or race is a silly thing to do. Of course, we have to wait for the movie to be released to say that these actors do the best job of representing their cartoon counterparts.
The problem is that Shyamalan cast the three (white) leads without further auditions. He had these three in mind from the onset, without giving race any chance. Why couldn't there be minority actors with talent, rather than white actors without it (if recent reviews are to believed)?

The whole world isn't Asian, if you haven't noticed?
The real world may not be, the entirety of the world in which Avatar takes place is.
 
I don't think you understand how casting works. For one thing, she's not black, but closer to Inuit. So, a black actress would have been a bad idea too. Second, you seem to be implying that casting a person of color automatically means that the character will be poorly acted

I think you're reaching. Ok, sorry I didn't say Inuit. That's ignorance on my part.

You seem to want me to imply that a person of color would be a poor actor. That whole thing was actually covered in my post, but you chose to cut out my second paragraph, where I wrote that we will have to see if these actors (the white ones) do the best job of portraying who it is they were cast as.

I understand where this whole racist or ignorance thing is coming from, but I would shoot for the best actor available, and like I said, I need to wait until I see the movie to say if that was done.
The problem is that Shyamalan cast the three (white) leads without further auditions. He had these three in mind from the onset, without giving race any chance. Why couldn't there be minority actors with talent, rather than white actors without it (if recent reviews are to believed)?

Well, he is the director. Like I said, I'm not 100% saying what he did was the right thing to do, but he is the director, and it is his decision to make who plays who in his movie (even if they are not a visually accurate portrayal of their anime counterparts).
 
How is it "fair" to cast an entire people Asian when they aren't even in this movie?

It's well-known that movies adapted from books can be changed to suit the audience or to include the director's creative touch to a series. How is this any different? How "fair" is it to cast Jesus as white in movie after movie, when the natives of the Mid-East are darker?

All three of the leads were changed from East Asian (Tibetan) and Inuit to white, whereas the light-skinned, China-based Fire Nation were turned into dark-skinned Indians. I don't really see the fairness in this disproportionate casting.

The Fire Nation is based on China (Air Nomas based on Tibet-Buddhism), which itself is well more diverse than Japan or even Korea.

If these actors can first do convincing acting, and secondly protray the character quite well while avoiding a carbon copy, then more power to the movie. Worse thing fans can expect from a movie-jump of a book or series is it to be exactly the same. If it was, well it'd remind me of Evangelion and it's multiple remakes.
 
If these actors can first do convincing acting, and secondly protray the character quite well while avoiding a carbon copy, then more power to the movie. Worse thing fans can expect from a movie-jump of a book or series is it to be exactly the same. If it was, well it'd remind me of Evangelion and it's multiple remakes.

This. I agree with. But, the fire nation was more Japanese to me in show. Earth Kingdom (My favorite) was completely China based. So glad to see that remains.

Oh and, movie ver,
N.Water tribe - Caucasian
S.Water tribe - Inuit
Fire nation - Indian
Air nomads - Mixed
Earth Kingdom - Asian, African (Small amount)

Noah doesn't look completely white to me most of the time. But again, I really don't care what they are as long as it captures the show well. I don't care about races as much as others do. What I DO care about is what the movie is actually like.
 
It's well-known that movies adapted from books can be changed to suit the audience or to include the director's creative touch to a series. How is this any different? How "fair" is it to cast Jesus as white in movie after movie, when the natives of the Mid-East are darker?
It's not fair at all. Not too long ago a black man received death threats for portraying Jesus in a stage play (yet not for also portraying the Devil). The key difference is that Jesus was never defined by his race as his message far surpasses any worldly presence.

The characters of Avatar were defined by their Asian heritage, yet this is undermined by Shyamalan somehow seeing whites as better examples of this culture.


The Fire Nation is based on China (Air Nomas based on Tibet-Buddhism), which itself is well more diverse than Japan or even Korea.
The Fire Nation is based mostly on imperial Japan.

Oh and, movie ver,
N.Water tribe - Caucasian
S.Water tribe - Inuit
Fire nation - Indian
Air nomads - Mixed
Earth Kingdom - Asian, African (Small amount)
While the Southern Water tribe is Inuit, the main characters from that tribe are Sokka and Katara, whom are being portrayed by white actors. It's a little jarring seeing two white kids standing in front of a group of authentic Inuit extras.
 
While the Southern Water tribe is Inuit, the main characters from that tribe are Sokka and Katara, whom are being portrayed by white actors. It's a little jarring seeing two white kids standing in front of a group of authentic Inuit extras.

Did you forget that Gran Gran is from the N. Tribe? It was a big plot point that she was different and not from the south.
With the N. Tribe in the movie being Caucasian, Sokka and Katara at least have an excuse, even though they could do to be mixed.
 
Did you forget that Gran Gran is from the N. Tribe? It was a big plot point that she was different and not from the south.
With the N. Tribe in the movie being Caucasian, Sokka and Katara at least have an excuse, even though they could do to be mixed.
I didn't, but you do realize that Gran Gran's Southern Water tribe husband would naturally be Inuit, so their son would be half-and-half. His later wife Kya would be full-blood Inuit as well, so it's a little straining of belief that Katara and Sokka are so incredibly white compared to their parents (unless, of course, Shyamalan casts their parents and grandfather white, which would be inexcusable).

Honestly, it all comes off as just an excuse to have the heroes white while still having Inuit Water Tribe members.
 
Last edited:
I didn't, but you do realize that Gran Gran's Southern Water tribe husband would naturally be Inuit, so their daughter would be half-and-half. Her husband would be full-blood Inuit as well, so it's a little straining of belief that Katara and Sokka are so incredibly white compared to their parents (unless, of course, Shyamalan casts their parents and grandfather white, which would be inexcusable).

Honestly, it all comes off as just an excuse to have the heroes white while still having Inuit Water Tribe members.

... Do you even remember the show? Their mother wasn't related to Gran Gran. Gran Gran's child was HAKODA. Their father.

Your arguments really are starting to shake now :/
 
This "controversy" wouldn't exist in the first place if nobody had said "OMG THE VILLIANS ARE MINORITIES THE HEROES ARENT SO RACIST!!!!". If we could have just accepted the actors as individuals, instead of grouping them based on their minorities and what roles they play, we wouldn't be having this discussion. But once you're locked yourself into that mindset, there's nothing the director can do to dissuade you. "No Comment" would be proof he's hiding from the controversy. A comment bragging about his equality would demonstrate that he's trying to play to all races (A big no-no). Saying that he's not racist would fuel denial.

What's left to say when you've created a controversy and won't let it slip away?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom