The strongest non-legendary Fire-type.

Hrvoje93

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
My opinion :

1.Charizard
2.Blaziken
3.Magmortar
4.Infernape
5.Typhlosion
6.Arcanine
7.Camerupt
8.Ninetails
9.Camerupt
10.Flareon
 
Strongest? That list is really bad then.

You've listed your personal favourites. Charizard is one of the worst Fire Types in termsof competitive battling.
 
Arcanine is obviosly the strongest fire-type.

It's base stat total adds up to 555. There's a reason it's called the "Legendary" Pokemon despite not being an actual legendary.
 
I'd probably say Ninetails as he's the only fire type (I think) that can learn Extrasensory (From Vulpix)
As for favourites, I'd say Vulpix.
 
Charizard as number one is crazy, stealth rock destroys it. Arcanine is really strong, so is Infernape/Blaziken.


EDIT: ^I'm pretty sure that Cyndaquil learns Extrasensory via breeding.
 
I like Infernape better than Blaziken (because monkeys kick ass!) plus Charizard is waaaay overlyused in wifi battles and I also like Typlosion shame it cant learn Earthqwake
 
You guys are crazy Of thousands of move you are only for stealth rock
Charizard is best .my Charizard in Platinum is slaying even rhyperior and dragons. With little status potions and level ups he is indestructuble .
 
BtW one wing attack fly or air slash on blaziken and he is tost .
 
Arcanine is obviosly the strongest fire-type.

It's base stat total adds up to 555. There's a reason it's called the "Legendary" Pokemon despite not being an actual legendary.

I ve got the Charizard on 90LV he beats The Whole Flint s team in platinum withou no sweat . i battled with him when he was on 50LV against LV57 Arcanine And charizard totally kick ass of arcanine .
 
There is an unimaginable difference between in-game battling and competitive play. In your list, the only ones who are even worse than Charizard are Flareon and Typhlosion. Those 3, with Torkoal are the worst fire types.

The best is Infernape, though I don't like it all.
Followedby:

Blaziken/Arcanine
Magmotar

And you listed Camerupt twice. :\
 
Arcanine is obviosly the strongest fire-type.

It's base stat total adds up to 555. There's a reason it's called the "Legendary" Pokemon despite not being an actual legendary.

BTw he is not "legendary" pokemon because of stats . its because of his look and one episode .
 
There is an unimaginable difference between in-game battling and competitive play. In your list, the only ones who are even worse than Charizard are Flareon and Typhlosion. Those 3, with Torkoal are the worst fire types.

The best is Infernape, though I don't like it all.
Followedby:

Blaziken/Arcanine
Magmotar

And you listed Camerupt twice. :\


Your problem is that you don t know play with charizard . i ve got 401 pokmons in PCBOX in Platinum And is one of the strongest ones i have .
 
thats a rip off of the best pokemon ever which is BLAZIKEN

Just because it recycles the Fire/Fighting typing doesn't make it a rip-off.

BTw he is not "legendary" pokemon because of stats . its because of his look and one episode .

Arcanine was once meant to compliment Articuno and Zapdos, as the legendary trio of Kanto. Moltres replaced it because GameFreak had rather have all three of them be birds, for consistency.

Your problem is that you don t know play with charizard . i ve got 401 pokmons in PCBOX in Platinum And is one of the strongest ones i have .

In-game =/= competitive play. It's not a matter of knowing how to use Charizard, it's Charizard's undeniable flaws. It's an alright Pokemon, and nothing more. It has glaring weaknesses and Stealth Rock, which is extremely common, wrecks it.
 
The only thing it has is Belly Drum. Outside of that, there are much better options for anything and evrything it can do.
 
My strongest Pokemon is Arcanine. To conquer the water/ground/rock types, sunny day and then hit after hit with Solar Beam. Then Crunch will elimate the ghost types and psychic type Pokemon. Flamethrower will destroy the steel types. That is the Pokemon I love to use time after time.
 
Please note: The thread is from 5 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom