This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them) (Newest Rule: 10/30/09)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fig

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
12,778
Reaction score
1,046
This forum is getting more and more activity, and a lot more presence from both side of the aisle (as opposed to the olden days, which consisted largely of a single conservative vs the Liberal hordes), which is good; and as a result, is getting very, very heated (which is not so good), and sometime downright rude (very, very not good), so, being that I am a moderator and some people have asked me to look over this forum, it is time to lay down the Law.

This isn't meant to be condemnation for anybody's past posts (I'd have to start with my own misdeeds, which are sinister in quality and numerous in quantity, then I'd have to take care of most of the rest of Bulbagarden staff, from evkl on down), but rather as a call to action regarding future posts.

There aren't many rules here; we still want fairly open discussion; we'd just like it to be a little less hostile than it's been lately.

First, death threats or wishes (that is, "I wish X would die") toward your fellow posters are absolutely and expressly forbidden, and are ground for an instant ban. The duration of the ban is at the discretion of the staff. We reserve the right to be lenient in borderline case, but you should never expect us to be; and you should err on the side of caution. (Other forms of violence or suffering are not considered much of an improvement)

For legal reason, that rule also applies to death threats and wishes toward the President of the United States (regardless of political affiliation).

Second, insulting generalization are not welcome. Americans are not all uneducated, Muslims are not all fanatics, welfare users are not all bums, liberals are not all hippies or communists, conservatives are not all warmongers or fascists. Abusive use of that sort of generalizations will be treated as trolling.

By extension, we ask that you try not to use offensive names in reference to political organizations or groups you don't like when arguing with members of those groups. Again, we reserve the right to treat abuse of offensive nicknames (such as "Anti-Choice" or "Pro-Death") in lieu of the proper terms as trolling.

Third, and I stress that this will NOT be a cause for infractions or warnings, I ask people to please heed Godwin's law. Comparisons to Hitler, Nazism and Nazi Germany (including the SS, Gestapo, cries of "Heil (Name)", death camps, the Munich agreement, and use of the term "Furher") are not a valid debating tactic. They make you look dumb.

In direct relations to that, no, comparing or linking people to the Soviet Union, its leaders and its ideology is not a better debating tactics. It also makes you look dumb. In fact, let's just assume that comparisons to Evil Empires, Evil Ideologies and Evil People, historical or fictional, usually don't reflect too well on you.

This, of course, does not apply when you're talking about actual communists or nazis (that's "people who actually identify as such"). Or the actual galactic empire from Star Wars if for whatever (very obscure) reason we should wind up having a debate about them. Note also that "socialist" and "fascist" are fairly legitimate words to use.

Fourth, we'd like to ask people to think twice before attacking another poster, rather than his ideas. Sometime, you may feel that it's vitally important to tell someone they don't know what they are talking about or that they are just plain dishonest; that's tolerated (within reason; if you start chucking out personnal attacks every other post we may resort to warnings and, failing that, infractions), but we'd prefer people to adress each other's idea, where possible.

Fifth, as a general tip to make your posts more interesting, you may want to take a look at these:
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html
No, we won't infract you for not following these guidelines. It's a free tip, not a rule.

Sixth, use basic posting courtesy; particularly with regard to all-caps post. This should be basic courtesy, so I will issue warnings and infractions right off the bat on that one.

Seventh, while we intend to keep our interventions to a minimum, we will not tolerate posts or threads that drag the forum in what we consider meaningless discussion (and will keep an especially close eyes on conspiracy theory threads in that regard), and reserve the right to take any measure we consider necessary to avoid this.

Eight, the mods decide what goes in the Hall of Shame or get closed. You don't. If you want a thread closed or moved there, report it (using the usual report function). Posts of the "In b4 Hall of Shame" variety will be treated as ridiculous spam.

Finally, nothing in these rules is set in stone. We're open to suggestions and comments, and will probably make change; these rules are a mean to an end, not an end in and of themselves.
 
Last edited:
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Yeah, but if we banned people who are unable to respect one another, we'd need to ban three-quarters each of the Democrats and Republicans parties from this forum right off the bat.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Well said. Well said indeed.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

I'm suprised people haven't used ther melon and figured out that crap like death threats and Hitler references are no-no's just without saying...
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

I'm suprised people haven't used ther melon and figured out that crap like death threats and Hitler references are no-no's just without saying...

Most people probably learned this from others at school. I've heard people at my school called everything from Hitler's son to the new founder of communism. Like that makes an sense.

And one kid in my class thinks he'll end up leading the KKK and assassinating President Obama. So, yeah, it's not very hard to figure out where people got the idea these were good debate strategies.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Yeah! Hear, hear!
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

In any debate you are going to get heated words, much of the time with out the person knowing what they are saying. There are many times where I have written out a post, walked away, came back ten or twenty minutes later and gone "Yeah that didn't come out right" or "I shouldn't have said that". I mean I respect the person, but when you are typing out long rebuttals the heat of the moment and the passion of the debate, can many times over take civility and common sense. Best thing I can say is for people to start typing out their post, finish it, and instead of hitting reply wait about half a hour and go back and re read what you wrote.

Anyway I don't know if that helps contribute or not, just what I have experienced over years of heated forum debate.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

In any debate you are going to get heated words, much of the time with out the person knowing what they are saying. There are many times where I have written out a post, walked away, came back ten or twenty minutes later and gone "Yeah that didn't come out right" or "I shouldn't have said that". I mean I respect the person, but when you are typing out long rebuttals the heat of the moment and the passion of the debate, can many times over take civility and common sense. Best thing I can say is for people to start typing out their post, finish it, and instead of hitting reply wait about half a hour and go back and re read what you wrote.

Anyway I don't know if that helps contribute or not, just what I have experienced over years of heated forum debate.

A good suggestion and one I'll remember in the future. However, it would help if people also considered what they were arguing about.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

But wait, does rule #1 apply for other leaders?

For example: "I wish that [the prime minister of country x would get blown the fuck up"]
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

But wait, does rule #1 apply for other leaders?

For example: "I wish that [the prime minister of country x would get blown the fuck up"]

Did you really feel the need to ask that? This is the internet. People from around the world can be on here. Of course it applies.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Did you really feel the need to ask that? This is the internet. People from around the world can be on here. Of course it applies.

Then consider it rhetorical :p
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Then consider it rhetorical :p

Ah, my apologies then. It just didn't seem to come off as rhetorical.

We need that Sarcasm font thing.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Most people probably learned this from others at school. I've heard people at my school called everything from Hitler's son to the new founder of communism. Like that makes an sense.

And one kid in my class thinks he'll end up leading the KKK and assassinating President Obama. So, yeah, it's not very hard to figure out where people got the idea these were good debate strategies.

A kid in my class just named his Science egg project Eggdolf Chickler.

So, yeah.


Welcome back to the Arizona education system.
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

EVIL FIGMENT... WHY NOT LET THEM BATTLE IT IN SPIRIT OF POKEMON...LOL...WELL IF 2 REGISTERED MEMBERS FLAME EACH OTHER AND CONSEQUENTLY GET BANNED... GIVE THEM A CHOICE 2 BATTLE 2 STAY ON.. AFTER ALL ,IT WOULD SUCK 2 LOSE A GOOD TRAINER ON FORUMS LIKE THESE... SINCE WE ARE HUMAN CAPABLE OF EVIL OR GOOD,A VERY THIN LINE IN MANY CASES AND WOULD BE UNJUST 2 LET OHKO GET THE BEST OF US.THIS IS A SUGGESTION AND SHOULDNT HONESTLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY...THANX FOR HEARING OUT..
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

*unclamps ears* Y'know, some keyboard cleaning solution ought to get that Caps Lock button freed up
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Rules now ammended to make explicit rule #6: Use basic posting courtesy; no all caps posts.

Regarding foreign leaders, we'd rather you avoided the death threats, but Obama is a bigger concern because of the legal issues involved, with our server being in the United States.

That doesn't mean go ahead and do it. That means don'T be too surprised if we're much quicker to punish when it's about the POTUS.
 
Last edited:
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

EVIL FIGMENT... WHY NOT LET THEM BATTLE IT IN SPIRIT OF POKEMON...LOL...WELL IF 2 REGISTERED MEMBERS FLAME EACH OTHER AND CONSEQUENTLY GET BANNED... GIVE THEM A CHOICE 2 BATTLE 2 STAY ON.. AFTER ALL ,IT WOULD SUCK 2 LOSE A GOOD TRAINER ON FORUMS LIKE THESE... SINCE WE ARE HUMAN CAPABLE OF EVIL OR GOOD,A VERY THIN LINE IN MANY CASES AND WOULD BE UNJUST 2 LET OHKO GET THE BEST OF US.THIS IS A SUGGESTION AND SHOULDNT HONESTLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY...THANX FOR HEARING OUT..

hahahaha you are the star of this topic
 
Re: This forum has rules, now (also, we'd like comments on them)

Be nice, Misty. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom