Twilight Princess: Overrated possibly

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Lucario Trainer

New Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
As an avid Zelda fan, I would have to say I was bit dissapointed with this one.

Twilight Princess is probably the most underwhelming Zelda game I've ever played. To let you understand how I let me explain in great detail.

First, I want to rant about TP’s plot since fans and critics seem to think it is flawless. But before I can even go into how godforsaken TP’s plot is, let me take you back to the N64 Zelda era stories:

In Ocarina of Time, after you pull the Master Sword and wake up from a 7 year slumber, you see how much has changed. Ganondorf now rules, and it has affected the land greatly. Castle Town is completely destroyed, Kokiri Forest (your childhood home) is now overrun by monsters, the Gorons are now taken to Death Mountain to be eaten by a dragon (Darunia being your sworn brother), the Zora’s are frozen in Zora’s Domain, Lake Hylia is drained, Lon Lon Ranch is now corrupted, Kakariko Village catches fire when Ganondorf unleashes Bongo Bongo, the carpernters are captured by Gerudos, Nabooru is captured by witches, and Zelda gets captured by Ganondorf after you beat the last temple. Unlike TP, there is way more reason to save the world after you pull the Master Sword. And, better yet, when you defeat temples, things go back to normal (with the exception of Zora’s Domain and Castle Town). You actually have a reason to complete the temples in OoT because you see your efforts affect the world around you!

In Majora’s Mask, Skullkid cursed the world of Termina with a moon that will crash in 3 days. If you don’t stop him, everyone in Termina will die. That’s just the main plot outline; there is more to it than that. You actually see first hand how Majora’s Mask’s evil has affected the people of Termina. All the side-quests in MM have you affecting the world in a positive way, and you see the results.

In Twilight Princess, you never see your efforts pay off, in fact, why should you even care? Here is why TP’s story is completely underwhelming! Yes, I said that, but I can’t stress it enough. You never have the urgency to beat the game other than to say you beat it. After Aribiter’s Grounds, there really is no reason to collect the Mirror Shards. Ganondorf if just sitting on his throne with Zelda (and how did she get there? Didn’t she die giving her power to Midna? Or did she does disappear back into the throne room?), doing nothing but waiting. . . for god knows what because its not like his character is after anything. There is absolutely no reason why he should have been including in the plot. Then there is Zant, also sitting on his throne. . . waiting for nothing. Perhaps that is the reason he went crazy? Not sure, but I do no this, Hyrule is in no danger. The Twilight is gone, and no one can even see that barrier that covers Hyrule Castle. There is no reason to go out and “save” anyone… who the hell needs saving?

Now, I wish my ranting on the plot of Twilight Princess could stop here, but it can’t.
The story is a mess, and things that should have been explained aren't.

In Wind Waker, it is explained why Link's sister is kidnapped; the bird mistook her for Zelda, but it TP, they don't even bother to explain why the Bulbin Chief randomly kidnapped Ilia and Colin. This may seem small, but it is annoying. Why wouldn't Nintendo explain the reason behind Link starting his adventure? It's retarded and results in the plot being incomplete and feeling rushed. To add to the rushed feeling, they tack on the Master Sword and Ganondorf just so it can be "cool" like Ocarina of Time or A Link to the Past. There was no thought in it whatsoever, and it resulted in one of the worst transitions in plot I've ever seen in a game (or a movie/book for that matter). It's unacceptable.

There are other parts in the story that are just terrible executed. What the hell happened to Zant? The first two cutscenes make him look not only like a badass, but scary. Up until then, we never saw a villain like him. So what does Nintendo do? In a matter of one cutscene, they completely destroy his character! Now, you can say “I liked how Zant turned crazy for no reason”, but that is not my point, my point is that that it felt like a 4th grader just took over that cutscene without even seeing who Zant was in the earlier cutscenes. There is absolutely no reason for Zant to go crazy like that! I actually had to play the game over again to make sure I didn’t miss a cutscene where it may give some foreshadowing to Zant becoming that way, but there is none! Of course, Nintendo wanted to make Ganondorf look like a bigger badass, but they didn’t succeed. Instead, it made Zant look retarded, and Ganondorf looked like he didn’t belong in the game.


Of course, my ranting can’t be complete without bringing up how dense and undeveloped the towns, side-quests and mini-games are! Obviously, the towns in Twilight Princess are empty with nothing to do, and they are small. Castle Town is the only town that is filled with people, but you can't talk to half of them and the people that do talk say the exact same thing the whole game. There are no developed NPCs with backstory like in Wind Waker, Ocarina or Majora's Mask; In TP, they are all cardboard and uninteresting. This may not seem like a big deal, but you’d expect TP to expand on NPC instead of taking a step backward. Then, there are no mini-games except that STARS one, but is that really even worth a mention? The town itself is extremely small when you actually think about it and compare it to towns in pretty much any other game that came out this generation, and the camera is fixed resulting in a restricting feeling area. As if all that isn't bad enough, you can't even enter 90% of the homes, and this is supposed to be the central hub on TP. What the hell? After Clock Town and Windfall, or even Kakariko in OoT, you'd expect a lot more from a game like Twilight Princess. The towns have absolutely nothing to offer, and this is a punch in the balls to fans that were expecting an upgrade from the N64 games.

There is absolutely no reason to go to towns. There are no side-quests there (or anywhere for that matter). I don’t feel like I have to get into too much more detail here since most can agree with me. The towns, side-quests, and mini-games (aside from the fishing) are dull and uninspiring. This is a huge disappointment since side-quests and towns opened up so many possibilities and rewards in the other three 3D Zeldas. Twilight Princess is a huge step backward in this area.


Last, but not least, Twilight Princess is the most linear Zelda game. This was going to be my strongest point, but to be honest, I’m tired of writing this thread right now, so I’ll just fling my point out there; Twilight Princess restricts you and holds your hand throughout the entire game. There are so many parts in the game when you are restricted to just one area in the game, and you have no freedom to complete dungeons out of order. The environments are just singles paths to dungeons (Ordon/Faron Woods is a single path to the Forest Temple; Death Mountain Trail is basically a straight line to the Goron Mines). The temples themselves have no backtracking; they just lead you straight to the next area. The overworld itself is just a single circle of messy lands clumped together by narrow paths and cliffs. . . I'll just hold off there for now. I know that once Hylian Dan or Mystic Link read this thread, they will be glad to take over from here.


To conclude the massively boring rant, I think Twilight Princess has a terrible plot, underdeveloped towns and characters, and linear gameplay that just makes TP look like a joke when compared to the other games. Twilight Princess is an overhyped, overrating, underwhelming, and unrewarding Zelda game.
 
I think Orcarina of Time is the most overrated, but I do think TP was kinda stale...personally I loved WW's redesign and thought it was super cute and very uplifiting to play.
 
You must admit however, TP used many elements from OoT now that I think about it. MM was probably my favorite Zelda game, it didn't use traditional and cliche elements to fall back on. It was truly it's own unique creation, and to this day I thank Nintendo for creating this masterpeice.
 
Probably because the fan reception was so negative because of MM and WW being so different from OoT they tried to make TP the next Oot to please the fans. That's what I got.

However, Phantom HourGlass looks to reclaim that. I've always found the portable games to be the strongest, tbh. Especially Link's Awakening, the TRUE greatest Zelda Game ever. Even short Minish Cap was pretty unique.
 
Probably because the fan reception was so negative because of MM and WW being so different from OoT they tried to make TP the next Oot to please the fans. That's what I got.

However, Phantom HourGlass looks to reclaim that. I've always found the portable games to be the strongest, tbh. Especially Link's Awakening, the TRUE greatest Zelda Game ever. Even short Minish Cap was pretty unique.

WW fan reception was bad? 0.o. It got fairly good reviews and cel-shaded graphics made people say "how refreshing". MM on the other hand was a different story, I personally thought the game was awesome, but many people overlooked the artistic direction and the improvement it had over OoT, maybe not qaunity wise but it matched up in quality I would say.

But TP didn't match up to WW or MM.
 
Uh, no WW fan reception was horrible! What do you think Celda implies! I am a huge fan of Wind Waker (infact it made me a Zelda fan), but I know I'm a minority, and Nintendo does too. It also is one of the worse selling zeldas to come around (in the US anyways) and it's partly because it couldn't push gamecubes like OoT did with N64s.

That said, I found TP stale also. It really is because it's basically a fan service game. Some elements I like... but when ever I see something I like I just wish it to be improved in the next zelda, but that of course won't happen (because they were some of the signature elements of TP)
 
I'm not sure why MM was hated (maybe the three day limit or shorter game length?), but I know that WW was greatly looked down upon because of cel-shading. At the time, people thought it was very cartoony and made it look very lame.
 
I'm not sure why MM was hated (maybe the three day limit or shorter game length?), but I know that WW was greatly looked down upon because of cel-shading. At the time, people thought it was very cartoony and made it look very lame.

... And it's people like you who continue to say "Graphics don't make a game" -_-

But I agree with you MM was absolutely terrific, and arguably you have to admit 5 Zelda games did use the cel-shaded look, so why critque it now when it comes to cel-shaded graphics? It doesn't make sense really.

Uh, no WW fan reception was horrible! What do you think Celda implies! I am a huge fan of Wind Waker (infact it made me a Zelda fan), but I know I'm a minority, and Nintendo does too. It also is one of the worse selling zeldas to come around (in the US anyways) and it's partly because it couldn't push gamecubes like OoT did with N64s.

That said, I found TP stale also. It really is because it's basically a fan service game. Some elements I like... but when ever I see something I like I just wish it to be improved in the next zelda, but that of course won't happen (because they were some of the signature elements of TP)
Well is still sold well, regardless of Japan being in the picture or not. And again arguably 5 games used the cel-shading, and one did prior the WW release.
 
Last edited:
WTF!? I never even said that! It's no wonder you're so biased at Nintendo! You just jump to conclusions whenever you get the chance!

Oh and you haven't jump to conclusions on me? I can recall a time right now. Please don't be a hypocrite.
 
Now you're just deviating from my post just to save face.

What else is there to say other than that? You've done the same "jumping to conclusions" act you have bestowed on me. Now you are trying to downplay me for trying to at least address something properly, and it's a feat. you've also done in the past. How hypocritical.

But firstly, how does "jumping to conclusions" actually point out I'm bias against Nintendo? Everyone jumps to conclusions one time or another, it doesn't show that they're completely bias. Especially when it's not even true. I've had fairly positive comments on Nintendo in the past, and even right now I just said "MM and WW were great games".

You're just another media type, propaganda all over. But I guess who isn't these days? *sigh* I myself have committed this envious act, I'm just saying it doesn't help to contribute to this even more.

Anyway, let's move on.
 
What else is there to say other than that? You've done the same "jumping to conclusions" act you have bestowed on me.

Dude, who in the name of all that is holy registers on a Nintendo forum and starts praising the PSP/PS3/360 and bitches about the DS/Wii without expecting to be heavily opposed? That's like a Jew inviting Hitler over for dinner without expecting to be killed. I can't speak for everyone, but a lot of people are probably thinking that you're just trolling.

But firstly, how does "jumping to conclusions" actually point out I'm bias against Nintendo?

Whenever you see some little flaw with Nintendo, you jump at it and start declaring that they suck. That's Sony/Microsoft elitism/fanboyism at its finest.
 
Dude, who in the name of all that is holy registers on a Nintendo forum and starts praising the PSP/PS3/360 and bitches about the DS/Wii without expecting to be heavily opposed? That's like a Jew inviting Hitler over for dinner without expecting to be killed. I can't speak for everyone, but a lot of people are probably thinking that you're just trolling.



Whenever you see some little flaw with Nintendo, you jump at it and start declaring that they suck. That's Sony/Microsoft elitism/fanboyism at its finest.

Moving on. . .

I don't feel like bringing this crap into a thread that doesn't fit the topic.

Always next-gen wars with you. . . >_>. Also I thought you could only be a fanboy to one certain console or company? I guess that's not the case with me, I guess I'm special. Also Considering the fact I argued the 360 was better than both the PS3 and Wii. I guess I'm automatically both since I don't say what you want me to say about Nintendo. Nice job.
 
The way that they did TP's ending sucked. I have the GC version and they had split the ending up. You didn't see the second half of the ending until halfway through the closing credits. They did do a good job on the way that Princess Zelda looked and the way that Midina look after the curse on her was broken. Some of the graphics had reminded me of Final Fantasy XII on the PS2, though. The PS3 only sucks because it is overpriced.
Ben
 
Last edited:
Always next-gen wars with you. . . >_>.

I'm not the one who started this argument.

Also I thought you could only be a fanboy to one certain console or company?

Says who? You could be a fanboy for all the companies if you wanted to.

Also Considering the fact I argued the 360 was better than both the PS3 and Wii.

You also argued that the Wii was the worst console.

I guess I'm automatically both since I don't say what you want me to say about Nintendo. Nice job.

It's not what I want you to say, it's that you just keep on bitching endlessly about how the Wii/DS is horrible. If you don't like them, then don't play them, simple as that.
 
Geofrey2004 said:
You also argued that the Wii was the worst console.
Yes I supported Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft at least once one this board. So your argument ends right there.

You saying "also" in that statement is an indication to that.

I rest my case.

It's not what I want you to say, it's that you just keep on bitching endlessly about how the Wii/DS is horrible. If you don't like them, then don't play them, simple as that.
Please stop it. You're getting nowhere by talking about it more. If you think that's the case argue my points for once instead of just saying "they're bitchy shut up!" you don't get anywhere with remarks like that. Maybe if you properly argued some of my points.

In addition to that, since you like to play the "Ignore it" cheap-shot. I advise you to "ignore my arguments" it's that simple.
 
Yes I supported Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft at least once one this board. So your argument ends right there.

You saying "also" in that statement is an indication to that.

I rest my case.

Arguing that the Wii is the worst console is supporting Nintendo? And you've really only supported Nintendo's old games, which has nothing to do with my argument.

Please stop it. You're getting nowhere by talking about it more. If you think that's the case argue my points for once instead of just saying "they're bitchy shut up!" you don't get anywhere with remarks like that. Maybe if you properly argued some of my points.

And you say that I'm a hypocrite? I've been countering your arguments, but you seem to ignore some of those too.

In addition to that, since you like to play the "Ignore it" cheap-shot. I advise you to "ignore my arguments" it's that simple.

I can choose to to respond to your arguments or ignore them. You can choose to play games that you don't like or ignore them. However, you cannot choose to endlessly whine and bitch about Nintendo games on a Nintendo forum. That can't be ignored by admins and mods.
 
Arguing that the Wii is the worst console is supporting Nintendo? And you've really only supported Nintendo's old games, which has nothing to do with my argument.

The point is I've showed Nintendo some respect in some ways. That's my point. And it doesn't matter "if I've ONLY" I've supported them when I thought necessary. So stop pulling that "Sony/Microsoft elitism" crap over my eyes.

Argument? What argument? Other than to say "You complain about the Wii"... Some argument that is. What a joke.
 
The point is I've showed Nintendo some respect in some ways. That's my point. And it doesn't matter "if I've ONLY" I've supported them when I thought necessary. So stop pulling that "Sony/Microsoft elitism" crap over my eyes.

That's some way to show respect then. All the more reason to think you're an elitist.

Argument? What argument? Other than to say "You complain about the Wii"... Some argument that is. What a joke.

I'm afraid the only joke around here is your arguments. If you don't like the games a company makes, then ignore them. Whining and bitching will get you nowhere. I don't like the PS3 and I don't care much for the Xbox 360, but I don't whine about them like you do. If you want to argue about them, then make a valid point, not this Miyamoto is finished crap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom