Type inconsistency

[regice999]

On the main page, it says Missigno. and M have Normal as a secondary type. On the Normal type page, it says there are NO (absolutely none) Pokemon with Normal as a secondary type. Maybe it's due to their being glitch pokemon? What do you guys think?

 

[Ino-Chan]

It also has "Bird" type. Last time I checked, there wasn't one.

 

[The Outrage]

On the main page, it says Missigno. and M have Normal as a secondary type. On the Normal type page, it says there are NO (absolutely none) Pokemon with Normal as a secondary type. Maybe it's due to their being glitch pokemon? What do you guys think?

-_-

 

[Zephy]

It also has "Bird" type. Last time I checked, there wasn't one.

That's a glitch type.

 

[regice999]

Uh.. well, sometimes I lack common sense. I just wanted to be absolutely sure. Thanks everyone.:thumbup:

 

[Missingno. Master]

For some strange reason I cannot fathom, most of Bulbapedia don't think that Glitch Pokémon are real Pokémon. That's why.

 

[TTEchidna]

They're glitch data (often data marked for other things that gets imported) used as Pokémon data. ASH is your name, Missingno. appears at the Cinnabar coast. And all because ASH IS YOUR NAME. It's name data used as Pokémon data, and it activates the filler data between the actual species they intended (since there's 255 slots and only need for 151 of them). They aren't real Pokémon any more than the Teru-sama is a real item or the Mystery Zone a real place.

 

[manga_meijin2]

Makes sense to me