inkysquid12
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2007
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 0
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,1999968,00.html
This looks like one plan that probably won't come to fruition. It looks like the report is trying to deflect responsibility from the fact that politics and the oil trade are too intertwined.
It's a bit suspicious that there are no lines of cars with hydrogen combustion engines currently on the market. I think if more of an effort had been made they would already be feasible for an average family car. Electric cars are currently inefficient but i would rather see the US government give money to projects concerning the development of this kind of technology, than issue a flimsy report that seems to shy away from saying that we should be cutting down greenhouse gas emissions, and instead suggests that the problem should be ignored for as long as possible.
Also, once China really 'gets going', the problem is going to get exponentially worse.
This looks like one plan that probably won't come to fruition. It looks like the report is trying to deflect responsibility from the fact that politics and the oil trade are too intertwined.
It's a bit suspicious that there are no lines of cars with hydrogen combustion engines currently on the market. I think if more of an effort had been made they would already be feasible for an average family car. Electric cars are currently inefficient but i would rather see the US government give money to projects concerning the development of this kind of technology, than issue a flimsy report that seems to shy away from saying that we should be cutting down greenhouse gas emissions, and instead suggests that the problem should be ignored for as long as possible.
Also, once China really 'gets going', the problem is going to get exponentially worse.
