What do fans think now about Pokemon that are fire/fighting?

What do You think about the dual typing fire/fighting now?

  • I want a next fire/fighting starter

    Votes: 7 10.3%

  • Never again a fire/fighting starter

    Votes: 27 39.7%

  • I want a fire/fighting legendary

    Votes: 2 2.9%

  • There could be more but not starters

    Votes: 42 61.8%

  • I want a fire/??? starter thats secondary typing is: electric/ground/steel/dark/ghost/fairy/poison

    Votes: 26 38.2%
  • Total voters
    68
  • This poll will close: .
M

Matleo

追放されたバカ
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
4,542
Reaction score
796
It's time to make a finishing statement.
You can vote 2 times and always change your vote.
 
Last edited:
Unless it is a really good concept, I do not want to see another Fire/Fighting-type for a good while, although frankly, I think that we already have quite enough between the ones that we have now, so even then, is it worth the Dex space? It would have to be very good. Otherwise, let's see some more interesting type combinations.
 
Never ever again should we have a Fire/Fighting starter. However, Fire/Fighting Pokemon in general (non-starters) are welcome if they have good, unique designs.
 
While I recognise that the typing is a good one, I'd rather we stay away from it for a while. Possibly permanently in the case of starters. I'm open to the idea of Fire/Fighting non-starters, but they may not see much use compared to Blaziken & Infernape.

Maybe in future, have a primarily Fighting type Pokemon that has a split evolution line and gains Fire/other types dependent on what it evolves into.
 
I'd have no problem with non-starter related fire/fighting types. The type combo in itself is fine, but having it limited to only final starter forms (3/6 for that matter) is incredibly boring. Give it to some other random Pokemon.

No more fire/fighting starters evolutions ever plz.
 
I actually really like Fire/Fighting combos, Blaziken and Infernape are some of my favorite Pokemon to battle with. I would just prefer that if anymore of this combo are introduced, they are not starters, and 'mon that don't need to evolve three twice to reach the combination. I'll even be fine with Alola form of Hitmonchan/Hitmonlee/Hitmontop that is a fire/fighting combo (actually, I think it would be great if they all got Alola variants with diferent types/combos).
 
I'd be fine with another Pokémon with a Fire/Fighting typing, but only under the following conditions:
  1. The new Fire/Fighting Pokémon is not the starter. Isn't the fact that we've gotten 3 Fire/Fighting starters in a row enough for you, Game Freak? Come up with some other Fire-type combos for starters instead.
  2. It is not heavily advertised or given special treatment.
  3. The concept behind it is solid.
ShinyGreninja said:
I'll even be fine with Alola form of Hitmonchan/Hitmonlee/Hitmontop that is a fire/fighting combo (actually, I think it would be great if they all got Alola variants with diferent types/combos).
Click to expand...

Actually, that's a nice idea! I'd imagine that they'd technically be Fighting/Fire in this case due to their primary type being Fighting, but that's really just a minor detail.
 
I love the combination. And I really like Infernape and Emboar. But I can understand the fatigue that people feel about Fire/Fighting starters. Funnily enough, the combinations is still pretty rare with only 6 Pokémon, but they're all in some of the most seen Pokémon of a generation. I hope that more fire/fighting Pokémon are created in the future, since they consistently have interesting designs for them.
 
I'm fine with the concept but I don't like it slapped on to yet another Starter. It feels old and tired, mostly because we got three of them in a row. So if GF would put together a nice Fire/Fighting 'Mon that was not a Starter, I'd be happy with it. Let's just get some variety in our Fire Starters, mmmmkay? (And for the love of all that's holy, make one a freaking quadruped in its final form!)
 
Id like them to stop having starters have it, its just been done so many times. I think they ought to branch out and go for some other ideas and typings. Maybe I would be ok with a regular Pokemon having that typing in the future, but idk.
 
I think they are very boring. I am not a fan of the fighting type in the first place, and a fire- fighting type is even more boring, for how repetitive it is.
 
Last edited:
I want a Fire/Fighting starter pokemon again and yes, I am serious. It is a great combo that usually gives the starter strong attack stat. So bring on the Fire/Fighting starters again! Or a legendary with that type would be neat.
 
I'm in the "I don't really care" club, since I wasn't in the fandom when Infernape's and Emboar's typings were revealed, and the backlash that followed.

But i am genuinely afraid of the internet backlash if the leak is true.

Plus, I like all of the Fire/Fighting starters.
 
Please...just no more starters with the combo....just...no more.

This goes doubly for if it looks fire/fighting but isn't. Because we all know it was going to be another one before they decided to spread the tying out more.

What im trying to say here is that I dislike litten 3's supposed design so much. It's the first pokemon that I actually don't see myself getting used to.
 
Please note: The thread is from 10 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom