• Hiya, everyone --

    Recently we've been noticing there have been a few stories here and there that have been posted without content warnings. As a reminder, we ask that every work published in our Workshop contain content warnings, even if none apply (in which case, you can just mention that no content warnings apply). You can refer to a helpful guide on how to rate your stories here, but if you need any further assistance, please feel welcome to contact a Workshop staff member! We're here to help.

    Thank you all for helping us ensure our community is a safe and healthy one, and for your continued patronage in our Library and Workshop.
  • Hiya, everyone!

    If you'd love to recieve a story of your choice, or write one for another user, please consider taking a look at our recent Writers' Workshop event announcement!

    We're all really excited to see how this fun Winter-themed gift exchange we're running will go, but we need your help! Signups end on the 6th of October, so please don't wait too long -- check out the thread linked above for more information!

    We hope to see lots of familliar and new faces around for Eiscue's Exciting Exchange!
  • Our friends at Johto Times have concluded their massive Favorite Pokémon Poll and the final results are now up. Click here if you're interested in seeing if any of your favorites made it!

What do you think makes a review a good one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
8,702
Reaction score
13,536
Often times while posting a story, people are often hoping to receive reviews for their story. Some can range to the generic "Great story! Can't wait to read more!" or the brutal and almost discouraging reviews from Farla. My question to you is what do you think actually makes a good and well rounded review.

In my honest opinion, a good and well rounded review does the following things.
1. It tells the author what they think about the story itself.
2. It tell them what they're doing wrong and how they can fix it.
3. While not obligatory, it tells the author what they like about the story.
4. It encourages the author to improve.
 
Sounds pretty solid. I go by the 1:1 complement/criticism ratio, but that's just me. The uniqueness of each review is like the best part IMO- different perspectives an' all.
 
In my opinion a good review mentions what the reviewer likes about the story as much as the criticism. Criticism should always be constructive, and ideally so should the praise - otherwise the author can't really do much with the review.

I always try to mention any other factors that affect my enjoyment, such as whether I'm a fan of the genre, etc. I probably won't enjoy a dark fic as much as a frothy journey fic, but since matters like that are personal preference I try to make that clear in any review I give
 
In my opinion, a good review tells the author what's wrong/what didn't work with the story, but more importantly how they can fix it. I don't value praise as much as I value constructive criticism. Maybe I'm just weird, but I prefer brutal honesty. If the story sucks, I want you to tell me that it does. But more importantly, I want you to tell me how I can fix it. If you just tell me "This story sucks I hate it," well, I'm sorry, but I can't fix that, because I have no idea what you want me to fix. If, instead, you say "This part was really bad, I think this would have worked better" then, awesome, I'll go see if I can fix that! Don't sugar-coat things, don't try to give me equal praise on trivial things to make me feel better, just tell me up-front what works and what doesn't.

This is part of the reason why I refrain from reviewing, because I understand that hardly anybody else has my mindset, and I just come across as a big jerk. xD
 
We do already have several other threads for the discussion of reviews and their quality. Would you like to look at some of those and see if this discussion warrants being moved there?
 
For me, this is a situational thing and largely dependant on the author.

Firstly, it depends on the quality of the story. I've reviewed stories that I thought were so good that any criticism I gave felt like I was really reaching. Conversely, I've reviewed stories that were so bad that it was very difficult to find anything worthy of praise, and that any praise I gave felt very superficial and mere token encouragement. In these situations, finding a good balance between criticism and praise just isn't possible.

So for that reason, I don't consider balance to be essential towards making a good review. What I feel is more important is being as helpful as possible using the most suitable tone.

If a review points out a flaw, it should always follow that up with a suggestion to fix that flaw. Reviews that merely point out flaws can be very discouraging, while reviews that only give praise aren't all that useful to an author looking to improve. Preferably, it should do so without being a massive dick about it unless the author has specifically stated that he or she prefers that reviewers are brutally honest with them. From my own experiences and from what I've gathered from other people, reviews that are condescending or inflammatory aren't well-received, no matter how balanced or helpful they were.

Just flaw fixing though can make it look like that your only reviewing just so can point out what's wrong, no matter how well-intentioned you wer, so I think it's also helpful to tell the author what you thought of the story because that gives the impression that you're an interested and willing reader.
 
We do already have several other threads for the discussion of reviews and their quality. Would you like to look at some of those and see if this discussion warrants being moved there?
I actually just found one from another user on another topic that was basically the same as this. I guess this could be locked if we already have a thread like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom