• The forums' spoiler embargo for all content from Pokémon Legends: Z-A's Mega Dimension DLC has been lifted! Feel free to talk about the new content from the expansion across the forums without the need of spoiler tabs!

    Please note that this lifted embargo only applies for the forums, and may still be in effect on other Bulbagarden sites.

Who thinks Lucario should be classified as a Legendary?

Midnight Blue

~Love Is Hard To Define~
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
3
I think so. Even though Legendaries are not supposed to have "baby" forms, and have genders, I think Lucario should be a legendary. And Lucario may not have the stats for one or does it?
 
Its deffinitely a cool Pokemon, but its not legendary material. Neither is Dragonite and company.
 
No. It's not even pseudo-Legendary. It lacks the stats, it evolves, it lays eggs and it's gendered. It's not even close to be Legendary. It may be an interesting or important Pokémon, but it's nowhere near meeting the requirements for being Legendary.
 
Ah I see, well I wonder what would of happened if Lucario became a legendary in the first place?
 
Manaphy and Phione breed, though they are genderless. Phione also lacks the stats (Base total is 480).
 
Why would it be legendary? Clearly if it doesn't meet any of the requirements of a legendary it can't be one.
 
I think the only place in pokemon where Lucario would even look legendary is in Pokemon Ranger 2. I mean he was on the same level/position as Heatran and Cresselia.

But no, Lucario shouldn't be legendary.
 
Lugia breeds as well, as we first saw in "The Mystery is History". But I agree, Lucario isn't Legendary material.
 
lololololololol

charzard shud b a legendary 2 cause its cool and looks like a dragonn

No, seriously. Why should Lucario be a legendary? It's not uber, it's not one-of-a-kind, it's breedable...
 
lucario is legendary material when you have him at lvl 60 it should be classified.

By that logic, so should Venusaur, and Heracross, and Dragonite, and Scizor, and Torkoal, and Bibarel....You get where I'm going with this.

It's level doesn't matter as any Pokemon can concievably be of any level.

Lets see...Manaphy breeds, Phione doesn't have "uber stats," Heatran has Genders (as well as Cresselia, Latios and Latias.)

If these are your criteria, then any Pokemon should be legendary. The question is, what's so special about Lucario?

Why should Lucario be a legendary? Why not Ludicolo? Or Luxray? They all meet the exact same requirements as Lucario, why not them? Exactly. Lucario has absolutely nothing that makes him stand out from any other Pokemon, so why should it be classified as legendary?

If you're suggesting Lucario out of sheer popularity, well, Jigglypuff and Pikachu are just as, if not more, popular than Lucario. Should they be legendary? No. Then neither should Lucario
 
I think the first time I saw the eighth movie was when I was just starting to get back into Pokemon, and I immediately assumed Lucario was a legendary. When I found it wasn't, I was like WTF.

But no. Lucario should not be classified as a legendary. It simply isn't legendary material.
 
This is an old argument. The Lucario in the movie was expertly trained in the aura, it was special. Lucario was never intended to be a legend, or even close to one. True, the fact caught us all off guard, but it is the truth.
 
Rare? We could have zillions of legends according to that criteria. We could even have legendary Dunsparce according to that.
 
no lucario is an aura pokemon aura=rare=tough=leqendary material.simple math.

First of all that is not math, I'm worried if you even go to school if you think putting = with words is math.
And just to put it sort of bluntly, if we had every Pokemon that is fanboyed to death as a legendary, we'd have about 100 legendary Pokemon by now. Lucario has nothing that is "Legendary" material.
 
Please note: The thread is from 12 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom