Who would you rather have?

Which would you rather have?

  • One who's athletic, handsome, rich and kind, but borderline retarded.

    Votes: 1 5.6%

  • One who's intelligent, handsome, rich and kind, but physically weak with lots of health problems.

    Votes: 4 22.2%

  • One who's intelligent, athletic, rich and kind, but looks repulsive.

    Votes: 1 5.6%

  • One who's intelligent, athletic, handsome and kind, but lives on welfare.

    Votes: 11 61.1%

  • One who's intelligent, athletic, handsome and rich, but treats his/her partners like trash.

    Votes: 1 5.6%
  • Total voters
    18
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Roses Ablaze

Avatar by Ayumeg
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
7
I haven't decided, but I know who I wouldn't pick - the jerk and the idiot.
 
I would rather have a healthy and intelligent guy that lives on welfare. Money never really mattered to me much.
 
Same here. I know it sounds horrible, but I could never be with someone who was extremely unintelligent. Well I could, but there would have to be something really special there.
 
I'd pick the poor one, too, except that I don't like the idea of marrying someone I have to support.
 
hmmm... I don't really care about a girl being athletic... Plus I'd have to see their personality (I know, boo) but I'd have to know what kind of jerk or why they were poor. (If they are poor because they are always spending everybody's money then I can't have that ^_^;; )

If that's the case I'd pick ugly... but then how ugly... (Okay, I'm a little bit shallow, but what person isn't to some degree. I'm not saying I need someone beautiful... I'd just prefer not to get the wicked witch of the west...)
 
Man, I'd hoped that picking "intelligent" would give me a good head start. It only eliminated one choice. XD

I'd also have to go for Miss Welfare. I pretty much know I'm gonna wind up being the financial support for my family when the time comes anyway, so it doesn't matter how poor she is. XD
 
I'll go with the weak one. Muscles are nice, but as long as they're still good-looking... :p

Well... as long as his health problems don't include a horrible, horrible disease that makes him slowly and painfully die. I don't think I could handle that. :eek: If the health problems are real extreme, I'll go with the poor one and we'll live broke together since I don't really see myself making a lot of money.

That or swingin' single. Much less of a hassle. XP

EDIT: Re-phrased a couple sentences for clarity's sake.
 
Last edited:
The one on welfare . . I'd have to have an intelligent boy because I wouldn't be able to live with someone that wasn't bright. If plans work out I'll become wealthy enough to support two people . . maybe a mansion is in the future? (This is me daydreaming about my future.)

hmm . . yes, I'd like a smart boyfriend and they'd have to be somewhat attractive, because I've grown up shallow (ironic though, I was hideous my first twelve years of my life . . well, not hideous, but you get it/)
 
One who's intelligent, athletic, rich and kind, but looks repulsive.
Click to expand...
If you're really in love, you'll love your partner's appearance no matter what.
Besides, the appearance is the easiest thing to change

However, I don't like muscles at all.
 
One who's intelligent, handsome, rich and kind, but physically weak with lots of health problems
Click to expand...

Like others, depends on health problems. Someone who might die as soon as I marry them is a no.
 
i agree with the others,i would pick the guy on welfare,i would rather have a healthy,kind person than a person who could get me infected with something,and who's almost dead.
 
One who's intelligent, athletic, handsome and rich, but treats his/her partners like trash. Is what I voted for. In a relationship, parents matter and have a effect little on what you think of people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom