With regards to advertisments on Bulbapedia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
16,873
Reaction score
2,392
Pronouns
  1. He/Him
I just thought I'd clear up a couple of common misconceptions regarding how the advertisements on Bulbapedia work, so that when bad ads turn up there, we can hopefully deal with them a lot quicker.

1. Bulbapedia's ads are geographically distributed
In short, this means that the ads seen by people in the US are different to what's seen in Canada, different to what's seen in Australia, different to what's seen in the UK, and so on and so forth.
Remember that I live outside of the US myself. In most cases, I don't see the same ads you do. Many staff members won't either.

2. Bulbapedia has no direct control over the advertisements
Our ads are provided by an outside ad company, who are the ones who sell the ads. This is standard practice amongst many large websites where there is not one single large sponsor. The system is large and complex, and we have little direct control over it. Ads are automatically added to the rotation by their system, and while all ads are automatically checked, there will always be some evil bastards who've found ways to get past those, leading us needing to remove ads from time to time.

To get an ad removed from the rotation, we need to go through them, and that requires us to be able to give them a lot more information than just the vague comment that one ad (which we don't know the identity of) is causing problems.

How to report a bad add
This is a simple process that so many people aren't following. PLEASE help us to help you by following this.

The Bad Ad thread can be found in the Garden Grotto here. Please post in this thread only, and do not start other threads to report ads. If you post in another thread, we may not notice it for a while, especially during busy periods like Christmas.

You MUST post a screenshot of the Bulbapedia page showing the bad advertisment when reporting a bad ad.
If you don't know how to take a screenshot, here's a quick guide.
While still looking at the page, hit the print screen (PrtSc) button on your keyboard, which will put a screenshot into your clipboard. Then, without copying any other text or graphics (which would replace the screenshot in the clipboard), open up any image editing software (even something as basic as Microsoft Paint, included in every copy of Windows by default). Paste (Ctrl+V or select paste from the edit menu) the screenshot into that program, then save the file and attach it to your post.

It would also help if you could give us the URL that the ad in question led to, as on several occasions we've had a bad ad displaying the same image as one of our good ads in an attempt to spoof it, while linking to something totally different.

f you don't give us a screenshot, it makes it VERY difficult to track down which ads may be problematic. Giving us a URL helps narrow it down further with a screenshot, but with only a URL, it becomes a very difficult process to try and track down the troublesome ads.

If you have any further questions regarding these advertisements, please ask them here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This isn't a question, more of a follow up about PrintScreening.

Although this may need to be checked, as I am not a Mac user, the "PrintScreen" equivilent for Macs is Apple/Command + Shift + 4. Just possibly something that should be mentioned... maybe?
 
If you've got Windows Vista/7, you can use the snipping tool instead of a full cap. Just click "rectangular snip" and choose the part of the screen you want to cap. The file will take less space than a full screencap.
 
And for users of Firefox who want to get just the inside of their browser window (hey, maybe you have sensitive bookmarks!), there's the Screengrab! addon. I use it all the time... makes it way easier.
 
And for users of Firefox who want to get just the inside of their browser window (hey, maybe you have sensitive bookmarks!), there's the Screengrab! addon. I use it all the time... makes it way easier.
Also, Firefox users should try not to use Adblock Plus, as that does not let the ads come through and pay the server costs off. I believe NoScript is fine, though.
 
NoScript doesn't allow ads either, despite this site being on my "allow" list. That being said, the only sites actually transmitting scripts are this site and Google-analytics.
 
That's interesting. You're saying noscript + adblock, even with this site on all your whitelists, is still blocking the ads? That's odd. How do you have us entered in your whitelists? Are there any other sites which show up in your unblock menu on noscript when you visit a Bulbapedia page?
 
I don't use adblock. NoScript and the Trend Micro Toolbar are the only extensions I use. But Trend Micro doesn't block ads, it just tells me if websites are safe or not and the status of my Internet connection. But this site has no other scripts from other sites surfacing in the NoScript report: Just Bulbagarden and google-analytics. If there were other sites poking in with advertisements, they would be listed in the report. All scripts are allowed here.

EDIT: I've just realized that you're talking about Bulbapedia as opposed to Bulbagarden. That's a different story. I don't use Bulbapedia much, if at all.
 
Last edited:
The ads I get on Bulbapedia are all from Google, and there are 4 different websites that are otherwise blocked.
 
NoScript should only block an ad if it's trying to run some kind of Cross Site Scripting (XSS). If an ad is blocked on Bulbapedia by NoScript without Adblock being installed, I'd be interested to see it.

i think noscript "blocks" ads with flash content only
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom