- Joined
- Jul 16, 2014
- Messages
- 682
- Reaction score
- 769
- Pronouns
- She/Her
- They/Them
EDIT: though I'll admit it's a little iffy. Changing the characters might not be THE answer. Like how Yu-Gi-Oh, Digimon, and Beyblade keep changing the cast every few years, but those characters really aren't so different/better than the old ones. Or for something closer to home, how Kenta in The Legend of Thunder and Red in Origins are essentially Ash with an extra trait or two (come to think of it, I'm not sure if Red is really any different from Ash at all)...
Red and Ash have less in common than you think. Red catches 150 Pokémon (and uses an Articuno to battle Mewtwo), uses a bicycle, disbands Team Rocket by reminding Giovanni the true meanings of being a trainer, has no companions with him or an evil trio following him, doesn't have Charizard as a walking Pokémon, and actually becomes champion and uses Mega Evolution. Being hot-blooded, coming from Pallet Town, and owning a Pikachu (who only appears once) are probably the only things they have in common.
Origins just ended with Red going after Mew. And who knows. If Origins gets a GSC-oriented sequel, we're in for an epic battle between Ethan and Red.
Back to the main topic. Replacing Ash is a Morton's fork as if his replacement has the exact personality as him, people will get angry for the writers giving us an expy (bonus points if the replacement also has a male Pikachu who refuses to evolve). If the replacement is very different from Ash, people will complain that he/she is just far too different from the hero they're used to (bonus points if the replacements doesn't have a male Pikachu who refuses to evolve). But keeping Ash will only lead to people getting angry of him being a flat, predictable character who will be 10 forever.