Mafia The Simpsons Mafia: GAME OVER: MAFIA WINS! 29/08/14

[Life]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

That reason being...?

I only posted once last phase (apologize about that, btw. I had a lapse in memory and didn't realize the phase ended THAT DAY, so I forgot to vote. >_>). Mijz sort-of accused me as a joke, and I simply stated I had nothing to defend myself against. You said it yourself; Mijz is experienced, so that is more than enough to justify the mafia targeting him first.

He was the only one to vote you, which is what I was referring to you.

But I mainly voted you to see what you had to say. For now, I will Unvote: GastlyGibus

 

[Hippowdon]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Thanks for letting me sub in i'm hoping I last a bit longer this game.

 

[Almonds]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 1: Vote Quimby 13/08/14

I've learned that here, no lynching day 1 is very scummy and that fact alone is enough proof I'm scum. So I'm not going to nl, no matter how much I want to here.

Based on the stuff that's already happened, I'm going to Vote: Kyriaki for voting HumanDawn for absolutely no reason, and Kryiaki's vote doesn't seem to be a joke vote.

Voting for No Lynch does not necessarily indicate one is scum, and why should you not vote for nl if you want to vote nl

Also, I voted HD for a reason. HD was following what Beck was doing, using similar reasons to vote another person. I see that as scummy because HD didn't have his own reasons for voting.

Then explain why I got lynched in Paper Mario Mafia for criticizing the d1 lynch, and suggesting an nl, and I became the top suspect in All-Star Mafia when I voted no lynch when everybody else was split between two baseless lynches.

Just because you became a top suspect in another game for suggesting an nl doesn't make you a suspect again in a different game.

 

[Darrman]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Well, bomb's dead and no mafia were wiped out. Oh well..... Since there hasn't been much posting, everyone's reads are null. For now, VOTE: Do not lynch.

 

[HumanDawn]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

VOTE: Midorikawa

I still find what Midorikawa did last Day Phase to be incredibly suspicious, so that's where my vote is going. She hasn't even responded to my post either.

Well, bomb's dead and no mafia were wiped out. Oh well..... Since there hasn't been much posting, everyone's reads are null. For now, VOTE: Do not lynch.

noooo oo oo oo we're not no lynching again

Voting for a no lynch isn't going to create and reads or leave any tracks, how do you expect for there to be any if we vote to do nothing?

 

[Mijzelffan]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Wow, it's been a very long time since I got nightkilled night 1. Is my perceived threat level rising?

 

[Oswin]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Well, bomb's dead and no mafia were wiped out. Oh well..... Since there hasn't been much posting, everyone's reads are null. For now, VOTE: Do not lynch.

Surely another day of no lynched is least beneficial to town?

 

[No Lynch]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

I agree with HumanDawn, we need some leads, and not lynching isn't going to get us anything. @HumanDawn; just so that I'm clear, what is the strike against Midorikawa? I want to make sure I know for certain the reasoning before lynching.

 

[HumanDawn]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

I agree with HumanDawn, we need some leads, and not lynching isn't going to get us anything. @HumanDawn; just so that I'm clear, what is the strike against Midorikawa? I want to make sure I know for certain the reasoning before lynching.

http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/f362/si...ing-16-08-14-a-167924/index5.html#post5334804

The strike against Midorikawa is that I think she was looking more for an easy lynch than actually getting people to speak up(and she picked somebody who'd yield the least results, no less). I'm not saying she's definitely Mafia but there's currently nothing else that strikes me as particularly suspicious and a serious vote should help kick things up.

 

[No Lynch]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/f362/si...ing-16-08-14-a-167924/index5.html#post5334804

The strike against Midorikawa is that I think she was looking more for an easy lynch than actually getting people to speak up(and she picked somebody who'd yield the least results, no less). I'm not saying she's definitely Mafia but there's currently nothing else that strikes me as particularly suspicious and a serious vote should help kick things up.

Thank you, I just wanted to make sure I knew the reasoning before doing what would be potentially jumping onto a bandwagon blind. Vote: Midorikawa. Hopefully we will at least get something happening from this. No action is honestly not an option on a Day 2.

 

[Neonsands]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Well, looks like I'm going to live a nice long and fruitful game.

R.I.P. Mijz

 

[Midorikawa]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

@Neonsands; is that all you have to say, really?


VOTE: HumanDawn

Not an OMGUS. I planned this vote before the new phase, but haven't really been on.

Reasons:

-The way he jumped on me for voting RS, but has completely ignored Frankie, who was the second vote, and thus the more damaging vote.
-He is stating that I was attempting an easy lynch, yet I never voted with intention for lynching. I voted for pressure stating I was going to push RS, because RS generally doesn't do much in discussion wise that actually leads to him being lynched due to inactivity. And I'm sick and tired of that crap so I want to push players into more active participants, and a day one with no discussion was a great start for that.
-The way he acted over RS. I bet you if I had chosen Glaze, then he wouldn't have thought it was scummy. And if human is mafia then I believe that RS is as well.
-Contradictory. He's attacking me for supposedly looking for an easy lynch, when I myself have proven an easy lynch, especially recently. Human is smart enough to notice activity patterns, and thus I have no doubt that he's noticed my own due to other mafias where I've recently only posted a little late at night my time, and haven't been on in the mornings before work, which he would know since if I'm on before work, I'm on Skype actively. This is of course assuming my internet is working which spans as a long time issue, and something I would be shocked at him not knowing about. Not to mention the common knowledge I'm on a tablet that hates me. This is actually my second time typing this post because psycho tablet deleted the original.

All in all, I find it scummy as heck that he's choosing to attack one voter and ignore the other, plus the way he just jumped on me for RS. Its strange, and abnormal behavior for him. Also mijz being nightkilled seems like someone he would target as mafia.


EDIT: @Flaze; this mafia exists. What are your thoughts? Be active

 

[Flaze]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

I don't even know what's happening so far so shut up : p

 

[Midorikawa]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

I don't even know what's happening so far so shut up : p

Well there isn't a lot to read through since most posts if not all have been small, so when you get the chance read and speak. It shouldn't take that long to read.

 

[Life]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Vote: Darrman Not voting is exactly what we shouldn't be doing.

I'm not too alarmed by Midorikawa's actions; but my eye is certainly on her, just like everyone else.

 

[Midorikawa]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

Vote: Darrman Not voting is exactly what we shouldn't be doing.

I'm not too alarmed by Midorikawa's actions; but my eye is certainly on her, just like everyone else.

And exactly why is your eye on me? What did I do that was so scummy? And why the vote on Dorfman? Just because he chose to no lynch? No lynching =/= scum.

 

[Life]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

And exactly why is your eye on me? What did I do that was so scummy? And why the vote on Dorfman? Just because he chose to no lynch? No lynching =/= scum.

My eye is on you equally as much as it is on everyone else. You've done nothing to make me think of you as scummy.

I'm voting Darrman because not voting isn't going to get us anywhere. We didn't lynch on the first day phase and we're in the same position as then, except with one less townie. We aren't going to get any leads by just sitting around here and doing nothing. I don't really want to lynch him, he's actually done nothing to make me think of him as scummy, but again, if we don't lynch this phase I fear we will be in the same spot in the next day phase.

 

[HumanDawn]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

VOTE: HumanDawn

Not an OMGUS. I planned this vote before the new phase, but haven't really been on.

I already voted you Day 1 so your vote this phase could be considered an OMGUS to my vote in the previous day.

-The way he jumped on me for voting RS, but has completely ignored Frankie, who was the second vote, and thus the more damaging vote.

Yes, it's alarming as well because of how she jumped on it, but admittedly less alarming than yours because you should have a better understanding of RainbowSkittles's play.

-He is stating that I was attempting an easy lynch, yet I never voted with intention for lynching. I voted for pressure stating I was going to push RS, because RS generally doesn't do much in discussion wise that actually leads to him being lynched due to inactivity. And I'm sick and tired of that crap so I want to push players into more active participants, and a day one with no discussion was a great start for that.

Your vote ended up staying in the end though. Yeah but that never goes well, and unsurprisingly, he already softclaimed. If you wanted discussion and some pushing you'd vote somebody else, RS has already established his gameplay to always vote No lynch first and despite telling him countless times he has remained the same, so your vote ended up being a pretty safe vote.

-The way he acted over RS. I bet you if I had chosen Glaze, then he wouldn't have thought it was scummy. And if human is mafia then I believe that RS is as well.

Obviously? Flaze is a different person and thus a different player with a completely different play style which you're aware of. You're more likely to get results and discussion from voting somebody else instead of a dead end like RS.

-Contradictory. He's attacking me for supposedly looking for an easy lynch, when I myself have proven an easy lynch, especially recently. Human is smart enough to notice activity patterns, and thus I have no doubt that he's noticed my own due to other mafias where I've recently only posted a little late at night my time, and haven't been on in the mornings before work, which he would know since if I'm on before work, I'm on Skype actively. This is of course assuming my internet is working which spans as a long time issue, and something I would be shocked at him not knowing about. Not to mention the common knowledge I'm on a tablet that hates me. This is actually my second time typing this post because psycho tablet deleted the original.

I don't think you're an easy lynch(actually, I have never said you were an easy lynch, so I don't know where I'm contradicting myself?), but whether you are an easy lynch or not doesn't matter, you've done something scummy and I'm going to vote you for it. I've actually already even told No Lynch that part of the vote is to kick things up to see how'd you'd react, and you're taking it way too seriously. I'm aware of your activity levels, but you didn't give me a response when over 24 hours passed so my reasoning still stood to vote you. This Day phase has 48 hours, so you already had a good 72 hours. You make it sound like as if I'm trying to easily lynch an inactive when you're not one at all.

All in all, I find it scummy as heck that he's choosing to attack one voter and ignore the other, plus the way he just jumped on me for RS. Its strange, and abnormal behavior for him. Also mijz being nightkilled seems like someone he would target as mafia.

I didn't ignore Froakie at all, what I said indirectly counted for her as well, but more for you for a reason I've already said. I don't see how it's strange and abnormal behaviour of me, you're accusing me of things without backing them up by explaining them. That's a really weak statement because Mijzelffan could have been killed first for a plethora of reasons, but if you're going to use it on me, then I could say the same for you.

 

[Midorikawa]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

@HumanDawn; I meant hypocrisy. I had it in my original post ad then the retyping ended up being contradictory. Regardless

-You just pointed out how it took me 48 hours to respond and that you are aware of my activity levels. 48 hours is not active at all.
-I was pushing RS over the sitting and doing nothing not the no lynch. And Glaze does the same thing thus its the same case. Faze even just proved me by his response, and I responded with a push.
-Tell me what makes what she did less than I did when her vote is more damaging?
-My vote stayed because 1) he wasn't in danger of being lynched 2) I wasn't on for the update.
-I'm taking it seriously because its a ridiculous and scummy made case that somehow got me majority votes in an inactive game.
@Life; Why vote Dorfman if he isn't scummy? Human and I have cases against each other. Why not look at those?

 

[Almonds]

Re: The Simpsons Mafia: Day 2: No Moe Suffering 16/08/14

http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/f362/si...ing-16-08-14-a-167924/index5.html#post5334804

The strike against Midorikawa is that I think she was looking more for an easy lynch than actually getting people to speak up(and she picked somebody who'd yield the least results, no less). I'm not saying she's definitely Mafia but there's currently nothing else that strikes me as particularly suspicious and a serious vote should help kick things up.

Thank you, I just wanted to make sure I knew the reasoning before doing what would be potentially jumping onto a bandwagon blind. Vote: Midorikawa. Hopefully we will at least get something happening from this. No action is honestly not an option on a Day 2.

Vote: No Lynch (username)
For (potentially) jumping on a bandwagon following someone else's opinion, not his own. Which part of Midorikawa looks scummy to you? Do you agree with HumanDawn's views or is there some other reason that you're voting for Midorikawa?