• Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Mafia YOU Mafia - Endgame (Intense Mess, Entities and Wickedness Enabled) - MAFIA AND INFO SEARCHER WIN

When would you like the game to start?

  • As soon as possible

    Votes: 8 36.4%

  • Early September

    Votes: 11 50.0%

  • Mid September

    Votes: 6 27.3%

  • Late September

    Votes: 10 45.5%
  • Total voters
    22
Reader mode
Max1996 said:
Unvote: Lone_Garurumon.
I'd rather not be part of a potential bandwagon.
Click to expand...

Max, why were you so scared to be a part of the potential bandwagon on LG, which was based on joke votes anyway?

It wasn't like the phase had only 1 hour left and your vote would have led to a mislynch, the phase had more than 45 hours and you could have kept your vote until you found someone more suspicious or you could have just removed your joke vote when the phase had moved to more serious discussion.
The reason you used for removing your vote was very suspicious. There was no reason to be so scared or nervous on the (joke) bandwagon building on LG as the joke votes would have been removed on the commencement of serious discussion. Also, we could have judged LG's reaction on getting all those votes.

MegaPod said:
Wuzzat? Feeling instaguilt about having a vote on what was one of three players with two votes? Seems a bit defensive to me. I have my doubts about you now.

Unvote: Lone_Garurumon
Vote: Max

If my initial joke vote actually gets us somewhere useful, that would be so fulfilling.
Click to expand...

Max1996 said:
Wait, three?
Cr*p...
Click to expand...
Your reaction on being pointed out was also fishy. Why did you get so shocked when you learnt there were 3 players with 2 votes on them?
Also, in what context is "Cr*p" used there?
Looks like "Oh cr*p, I got caught" or something.
 
Pika_pika42 said:
Your reaction on being pointed out was also fishy. Why did you get so shocked when you learnt there were 3 players with 2 votes on them?
Also, in what context is "Cr*p" used there?
Looks like "Oh cr*p, I got caught" or something.
Click to expand...
Well, I somehow overlooked that very thing when I removed my vote. It's not shock, but surprise.
And I realized what I thought was just me voicing my thoughts was that very thing getting me in trouble again
 
Got pinged!

scum!Max doesn’t defend himself, does he? That makes me hesitant to vote him.
 
Honestly, I’m more suspicious of MegaPod and pika_pika. Their main arguments against Max is based on meta and how he plays as scum but they ignore the fact scum!Max tends to give up easily and not defend himself. Still, both continue to press him.

What’s actually amazing is the fact that MegaPod changed his vote from LG to Max very quickly. It looked too opportunistic.

VOTE: MegaPod
 
Seth Rollins said:
Honestly, I’m more suspicious of MegaPod and pika_pika. Their main arguments against Max is based on meta and how he plays as scum but they ignore the fact scum!Max tends to give up easily and not defend himself. Still, both continue to press him.

What’s actually amazing is the fact that MegaPod changed his vote from LG to Max very quickly. It looked too opportunistic.

VOTE: MegaPod
Click to expand...
Our reasoning is largely based upon his overly-eager-to-not-look-bad unvote and subsequent “Crap” reaction to getting called out. And like Pika noted, there’s not really a substantial defense from Max here.

So if I find something to be a real lead right after I joke vote, I’m not allowed to switch gears to serious right away?
 
returnofmastercrazyhand said:
Unvote: ereshkigal
While I think the bandwagon on max is a bit stupid right now I can’t deny that we have no better options right now, that being said I’m going to hold off on my vote until a more definite bandwagon forms
Click to expand...
returnofmastercrazyhand said:
Okay we’re going nowhere with this game
Click to expand...
I really don't like these posts at all. The first post, which is posted very early on in Day 1, talks about how we are getting nowhere despite it being the time of day where there's only jokevotes. He comments about how Max is only option although it feels odd considering the time of day. He doesn't explain why he thinks the bandwagon is stupid. I definitely don't like him waiting for a definite bandwagon to vote, seems like he doesn't want to get involved with reading people and rather follows a bandwagon to avoid drawing attention to himself.

Another comment about the game going nowhere yet he doesn't explain why or give a explanation on how to move it forward. I'd say he's being acting worse than Max has.
Vote: @returnofmastercrazyhand
 
I got the ping.

Max1996 said:
If you're referring to the post I'm thinking of, let me add there is more than meets the eye.
Click to expand...
See Max, comments like this are why people lynch you. You're needlessly cryptic, which makes it look like you've got something to hide. Even if there is a negative repercussion to lynching you, cryptically hinting at it like this doesn't make you less likely to be lynched, it make it more likely.

Seth Rollins said:
Honestly, I’m more suspicious of MegaPod and pika_pika. Their main arguments against Max is based on meta and how he plays as scum but they ignore the fact scum!Max tends to give up easily and not defend himself. Still, both continue to press him.

What’s actually amazing is the fact that MegaPod changed his vote from LG to Max very quickly. It looked too opportunistic.

VOTE: MegaPod
Click to expand...
I can see the concern with Pika's arguments, but Pod's arguments aren't based on meta at all. Pod's arguments have only been based on Max's unvote and his reactions to other posts. In fact, most of the comments that consider Max's meta are actually his defenders, rather than his persecutors. I also don't think the Pod switching votes quickly is suspicious at all. All it means is that he was online a checking the thread when Max posted.
 
Lone_Garurumon said:
See Max, comments like this are why people lynch you. You're needlessly cryptic, which makes it look like you've got something to hide. Even if there is a negative repercussion to lynching you, cryptically hinting at it like this doesn't make you less likely to be lynched, it make it more likely.
Click to expand...
It's not (mainly) the lynch I'm worried about if I'm not being the least bit cryptic.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom