- Joined
- May 21, 2018
- Messages
- 2,155
- Reaction score
- 4,935
I wish there’ll be something in the games they choose to focus on instead of bringing back the whole dex, but the possibility that they took this decision to use it in the future, for when they’ll decide to improve in a deeper way on models and animation, or maybe for when the number of Pokémon will be truly daunting, is not unrealistic.
This way they’d take the bulk of the criticism now, and if there won’t be any tangible effect on the sales (even more so if the games turn out to be good), they’ll apply the same mindset for the future. Criticism on a limited number of Pokémon available will always be present, but it won’t be the same as it is right now.
If the reason is limited to some problems in development or rushing to get the game out, they wouldn’t have been so adamant in stating that this is their approach for the future.
This way they’d take the bulk of the criticism now, and if there won’t be any tangible effect on the sales (even more so if the games turn out to be good), they’ll apply the same mindset for the future. Criticism on a limited number of Pokémon available will always be present, but it won’t be the same as it is right now.
If the reason is limited to some problems in development or rushing to get the game out, they wouldn’t have been so adamant in stating that this is their approach for the future.