Myth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2015
- Messages
- 1,262
- Reaction score
- 2,555
Talk about taking things literally just to get away from the point though. I mean, I was the only one who used the word "recolor" and I obviously didn't mean it literally?Why are people pretending Wiglett is a literal recolor when it is not. It is quite similar but it moves differently, it's face is in a different location, and it has a different posture. They made an entirely new model and deliberately made it similar to Diglett in reference to the garden eel behaving like a Diglett.
It's something very simple to understand actually. Meant to say "recolor" in the same way Galarian Ponyta, Zigzagoon, Alolan Vulpix were for their original forms. Not really a recolor, just old monsters with a new take on it. The difference is that previously this didn't take up dex slots and didn't count as new Pokémon, now this one does. It's no rocket science, really.
And I'm not even one of those who didn't like it, but the way you took what I said literally just to get off the point feels unnecessary. Why?
Again, I was the only one who mentioned models that way, but I never said they used the same model from originals for Alolan Meowth nor for Wiglett? But of course there are shortcuts in the design process for both cases. Why do you think not?They did not recycle Diglett's model or otherwise take any shortcuts in the design process.
Last edited: