TheCapsFan
C'est Comme Ça
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2011
- Messages
- 10,497
- Reaction score
- 5,252
- Pronouns
- He/Him
- Staff
- #141
Let's say we flip jaison and he's town. Down the line we flip a mafia. We can go back and look at how the flipped mafia player interacted with these choices between wissen v jaison to potentially discern if wissen is mafia or not regardless of whether or not wissen posts. Vice versa for wissen replacing jaison.IF THEY DO NOT POST WHAT INFO CAN YOU GET FROM THEIR POSTS????
Did you forget what an inactive is?
We could, but wissen seems to be around more, so they are more likely to come back and clarify what they meant than jaison is to defend themselves. But if they don't come back and clarify, then all we can do is trust wissen's accusation at face value, which means we can get information on wissen by lynching jaison.The bold lines
That implies that wissen schaftler is also a scum by your logic, then why shouldn't we Lynch himself rather than jaison crasta. We could verify by that way too. Why should we take risk while eliminating jaison as wissen might have given a false accusation. Why shouldn't we Lynch wissen first and then jaison if he turns out to be a scum.
Plus I am more inclined to directly follow the finger of suspicion if I am to entertain my theory of occam's razor.
I have explained my reasoning for why I think we should lynch Jaison.Why should we lynch Jaison Krasta, when clearly Wissen has no proof...
Why are you so quick to assume that Wissen has no proof?