DawningWinds
Nobody's Guardian Angel
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2020
- Messages
- 12,691
- Reaction score
- 5,656
- Pronouns
- Any
- Staff
- #141
Yeah.What do you think then? That she's genuinely thinking Exlight is trying to get an easy lynch?
Ah, okay. I do think Jinjo reading the post you voted in as a case of chainsaw defense isn't really a stretch though.I never said anything about disagreeing (I mean, I do disagree, but), it was how I see Jinjo trying to get an easy lynch on Exlight, and her not even addressing what Exlight said before about the trying to get an easy mislynch.
feels like I'm repeating my words a lot with 'mislynch' and 'easy' so sorry if this gets confusing
Hm, good point. Him not voting Zinn really doesn't seem to have really had anything to do with thinking Zinn was town, based on that post.I agree with this, even this post:
is neutral, since it's not even really about Zinnlav or the claim at this point. More like just pointing out how Day 1 lynches can be more dangerous for town.
Hmm, in a world where Alvis is town, I could see Dickson as maybe a Serial Killer based on that.This is kinda spoilery, but (iirc, I could be mistaken on some stuff):
So if mafia = mechon only, then it'd be kind of weird to have Dickson on their side?Dickson is some kind of disciple of the god of the Bionis, who wants to destroy all living things because reasons. He backstabs the party, but is not aligned with the Mechon at all.
Tbh Indep!Dickson might also be a possibility, but I don't know how feasible that would be in a game of this size.
Chainsaw defense I think is more against Space and Frozen Fennec; Jinjo talked about how scum will sometimes use the chainsaw defense for a player that's not on their team so I think her thoughts are probably something along the lines of using chainsaw defense is a primarily scum strategy.But...I admittedly still don't get the whole chainsaw case against Ex by Jinjo; doesn't the possibility of the defender being non-scum aligned significantly weaken the legitimacy of using a chainsaw defense as an argument against someone?
Like, I can see how you might argue it had happened if the person who is being defended had already flipped scum, but using it as a basis to vote someone D1 when we have barely anything to go off feels... odd to me.
I feel like I'm spending way too much time trying to make sense of this single point, and I'm tempted to attribute all of this to me having a small brain, but ehh