- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 19,897
- Reaction score
- 13,960
Sure.
Reminder that even the Galar mascots were unveiled in their powered up forms.
Reminder that even the Galar mascots were unveiled in their powered up forms.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, these Boxarts are going to stay for the duration of the game's release. You put in a new element to attract viewers to the boxart, not hide it because of marketing cycle that would unveil it in 2-3 months anyways.We can't but okay. They could easily just want to hide something like that for the week of release.
Well, these Boxarts are going to stay for the duration of the game's release. You put in a new element to attract viewers to the boxart, not hide it because of marketing cycle that would unveil it in 2-3 months anyways.
Well to be fair, we do also have Suicune, Rayquaza, Lugia, and Ho-Oh who have featured on third versions/remakes and confirmed that they had not received new forms (though I guess Suicune was before this was really much of a thing anyway).The funny thing, at least when it comes to new forms in third versions and remakes for legendaries, they always slap the new forms on the box art, at least for some of the main legendaries in the story. Giratina for Origin Forme. the Kyurem forms on Black and White 2, ORAS with the Primals, Ultra Sun and Moon with the new forms for Solgaleo and Lunala.
Obviously they can finally change that tactic and not show the new forms, but it will definitely break the established norm.
They need the shiny new boxart more than they need the marketing season hype. The marketing season and the news hype would last for what? 2 months? But the game will remain on shelves for much longer than that. The vast majority of the buyers do not follow the promotion cycle and mostly care for what’s on the box and what they have seen as the gameplay. That’s why the shiny new forms to distinguish the new games are, well... on the Boxart.The boxarts don’t necessarily need to unveil new forms. Maybe they just want to hide it this time? Last time with ORAS everyone caught on to the boxarts being new forms and it wasn’t as hype when we found out about primals. I’m not saying there ARE new forms, I’m just this doesn’t necessarily prove that there AREN’T. They always like to keep a few things under wraps until people with review copies leak them, there’s no way to know for sure based purely off boxarts, which some have interpreted as Dialga and Palkia possibly “powering up” to change into a new form, although it’s more likely they’re just powering up their signature moves, you never know.
Because they're far less marketable. Ultra Necrozma is a special case, as the only reason it wasn't a version mascot was greed (wanting two versions). It had to be kept a secret for the mascots not to be pushed aside.Zacian and Zamazenta's unarmored forms, were kept secret during pre-release)
I think it's safe to assume that Dialga and Palkia won't be getting new forms. It's certainly possible that the new forms are being kept under wraps for some reason (Ultra Necrozma, and Zacian and Zamazenta's unarmored forms, were kept secret during pre-release) but I think it's unlikely.
If Dialga and Palkia aren't getting new forms, in some ways I think that's quite refreshing. I actually think Pokemon is starting to suffer from "form bloat"; it would become same-y if they kept slapping new forms on box legendaries. I like that the Pokemon Company has enough faith in the iconic-ness of Dialga and Palkia's original designs to use them as ambassadors for the new games.
To be fair, Palkia’s type was never unique to it and Giratina’s became non-unique at the same time as Dialga’s.Poor Dialga.
His signature move is recharge so no one uses it over Draco Meteor.
His typing got given out to a regular Pokémon and is now no longer unique.
His remake doesn't grant him a new cool shiny form like the other Legendaries that went before him.
No wonder dude went all dark and uncontrollable in the Mystery Dungeon timeline.
To be fair, Palkia’s type was never unique to it and Giratina’s became non-unique at the same time as Dialga’s.
I think that as far as new forms go, we might get origin forms should we be able to access their respective dimensions. It's not as flashy but still gives us something different while still retaining faithfulness for the most part.We can't but okay. They could easily just want to hide something like that for the week of release.
I never thought about the states of Dialga and Palkia being constants as a point against them gaining new forms before. That's a pretty logical reasoning that I think could have played a part in the decision for TPCi and ILCA to keep them as-is in terms of appearance.Also, pardon my waxing about thematics and that stuff, but I also think it's interesting in the sense that Dialga and Palkia were presented as linchpins of fundamental, universal concepts. From that perspective, they could be thought of as constants - they never change; they are what they are, and there's a purity to that. In other words, this plain and simply is what the ruler of time in the Pokémon world looks like - no ifs, ands, or buts.
Even if they did, do you really think we'd get to use them? I highly doubt such entities would willingly lend such power to the player character, let alone any other human.I know there's the theory that the forms were see are just avatars representing vast, incomprehensible beings, but I think that was always more of a justification for the curiousness of being able to capture these godlike entities in Poké Balls and start feeding them biscuits and making them dance around in costumes. (But who says a God of Space can't enjoy that?)
You just gave me an idea: what if when Dialga holds the Adamant Orb and Palkia holds the Lustrous Orb in BDSP, they just end up with different abilities that fit their powers as opposed to being stuck with Pressure? And the best part is that it doesn't need to even be unique or OP. After all, Giratina gets the common Levitate ability when holding the Griseious Orb, and situations like Zygarde and Rockruff even show that a Pokémon doesn't need a brand new form design and stat changes to have an alternate ability (although in their case those abilities give the access to fancy forms).I don't think every remake needs to introduce a new round of excessively powerful forms for Pokémon that are already exceptionally strong. I think for Groudon and Kyogre it was justified, half because of how it tied into the Mega Evolution plot, and half because Groudon and Kyogre's once-unique, characteristic Abilities had been democratized to several other Pokémon in the intervening years, so buffing them up a bit to make them seem more like the cataclysmic forces they're supposed to be makes sense.
But Dialga and Palkia have both stayed viable since they were introduced, and they were given signature stuff back then that remains exclusive to them (even if Dialga's signature move is rubbish). I feel like they don't "need" a boost as much.
Ultra Necrozma was "kept secret" in the sense that they didn't fully unveil it - but it was overtly teased by the cover. Meanwhile, I don't think I'd say the armorless wolves were kept "secret" so much as they were just... not shown, in a more casual sense, because the forms that outclass them were the ones that were clearly designed more for marketability. (In that regard, I'd almost say it's more like how they never "showed off" Xerneas's Neutral Mode. There wasn't a big secret to it, it's just that it's basically a less-noteworthy form that exists for flavor reasons more than anything.)
Also, pardon my waxing about thematics and that stuff, but I also think it's interesting in the sense that Dialga and Palkia were presented as linchpins of fundamental, universal concepts. From that perspective, they could be thought of as constants - they never change; they are what they are, and there's a purity to that. In other words, this plain and simply is what the ruler of time in the Pokémon world looks like - no ifs, ands, or buts. I know there's the theory that the forms were see are just avatars representing vast, incomprehensible beings, but I think that was always more of a justification for the curiousness of being able to capture these godlike entities in Poké Balls and start feeding them biscuits and making them dance around in costumes. (But who says a God of Space can't enjoy that?)
Anyway, the part I slightly disagree with is the point about form bloat - not because it's not a thing (there really are a ton of forms), but because surely if Dexit is the way forth, bloat isn't as big of a concern?
Primal Dialga from the Explorers games though.Also, pardon my waxing about thematics and that stuff, but I also think it's interesting in the sense that Dialga and Palkia were presented as linchpins of fundamental, universal concepts. From that perspective, they could be thought of as constants - they never change; they are what they are, and there's a purity to that. In other words, this plain and simply is what the ruler of time in the Pokémon world looks like - no ifs, ands, or buts.
Let's be honest, it wasn't. The reasoning is probably a combination of not having good design ideas (have you seen any good fanart in the 7 years these remakes have been discussed?) and the games not being Mega-driven like ORAS.I never thought about the states of Dialga and Palkia being constants as a point against them gaining new forms before. That's a pretty logical reasoning that I think could have played a part in the decision for TPCi and ILCA to keep them as-is in terms of appearance.