- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 6,720
- Reaction score
- 5,592
But we already know the reasons behind the "sequels"; Nintendo wasn't here for them doing two "third versions" just for those stupid difficulty key features, and GameFreak was dead set on doing it, so they compromised and made sequels. But originally Gen. 5 was getting Gray, just like Platinum, Emerald, Crystal and Yellow before it and just like Z after it. I don't know why it would be disappointing when both Emerald and Platinum are regarded as the gems of the series. They could easily do a Pokémon Z that outshines both X and Y while bringing the best of both worlds.
There's some things that need improving that a third version can't do though. The storyline could stand to be redone from the ground up, which they can't do because it needs to stick to the base storyline. The region design could use a huge facelift and add tons of areas like BW2 did for Unova. And on top of that, you get all kinds of neat bonuses like new characters and gym leaders.
@Bolt the Cat- I think that's one of the reason why you play the game. You utilize the story, you participate on it and you check the changes that has been made from the previous game.
No, that's why YOU play the game, not why I play the game. I look for new gameplay experiences in a new game, having new areas, an expanded regional dex, and the like is much more interesting to me than a slightly different storyline. And even the changes in the storyline aren't always that great, it might be slightly different, but it still needs to stick to the same structure of the originals. And if there's a problem with the game's structure, a third version won't fix it. You need a sequel that can make larger scale changes.