Since this topic kept on being brought up in this thread and derailing it into a huge fight, I'm giving it its own thread.
Are remakes always the most canon version of a story? Normally, I would say yes. They're the most recent and modern telling of a story, and they usually fit in better with the later games' continuity.
However, HGSS and ORAS complicate things.
Outside of Red's outfit, there isn't a single thing in HGSS that references FRLG over the original games. The many Yellow callbacks from the original GSC are still there, despite FRLG having not incorporated anything from Yellow, and the paired game ones could just as easily apply to Red and Blue as the remakes. There were never any allusions to the Sevii Islands (like there were allusions to Johto and Hoenn in FRLG), and none of the newly-added characters (such as Celio) ever appeared, let alone were mentioned. Plus, the rival's English name was still "Blue," even though that was never a preset name in any version of FRLG.
ORAS is even worse. While it isn't a direct sequel to another Generation, it's the first set of remakes to be of games on the newer side of the Great Generational Divide. It was just a Generation ago that we saw the RSE characters appear in their RSE outfits, and RSE have been referenced and acknowledged as canon for the past several Generations. Including, Emerald features that may or may not make it to ORAS, such as Wallace being a Champion and Juan's existence. Is all of that suddenly gone, now?
And, that's not even getting into Fairy Types and Megas. Dark and Steel were introduced before the Great Generational Divide, so they were fairly easy to retcon in, but not so for Fairies and Megas. XY treated both as being "newly discovered," and yet, here's ORAS, which takes place years earlier, with Fairies and Megas. How were these things known about in Hoenn, but not Kanto, Johto, Sinnoh, and Unova?
And, then, there's this tweet from Toshinobu Matsumiya that actually references RGBY, GSC, and RSE over FRLG, HGSS, and ORAS. I know, Death of the Author, and all, but if remakes were always more canon, then why would he reference the original Gen 1-3 games over their remakes?
So, are remakes still the most canon? Who knows? It isn't that cut-and-dry, however.
Are remakes always the most canon version of a story? Normally, I would say yes. They're the most recent and modern telling of a story, and they usually fit in better with the later games' continuity.
However, HGSS and ORAS complicate things.
Outside of Red's outfit, there isn't a single thing in HGSS that references FRLG over the original games. The many Yellow callbacks from the original GSC are still there, despite FRLG having not incorporated anything from Yellow, and the paired game ones could just as easily apply to Red and Blue as the remakes. There were never any allusions to the Sevii Islands (like there were allusions to Johto and Hoenn in FRLG), and none of the newly-added characters (such as Celio) ever appeared, let alone were mentioned. Plus, the rival's English name was still "Blue," even though that was never a preset name in any version of FRLG.
ORAS is even worse. While it isn't a direct sequel to another Generation, it's the first set of remakes to be of games on the newer side of the Great Generational Divide. It was just a Generation ago that we saw the RSE characters appear in their RSE outfits, and RSE have been referenced and acknowledged as canon for the past several Generations. Including, Emerald features that may or may not make it to ORAS, such as Wallace being a Champion and Juan's existence. Is all of that suddenly gone, now?
And, that's not even getting into Fairy Types and Megas. Dark and Steel were introduced before the Great Generational Divide, so they were fairly easy to retcon in, but not so for Fairies and Megas. XY treated both as being "newly discovered," and yet, here's ORAS, which takes place years earlier, with Fairies and Megas. How were these things known about in Hoenn, but not Kanto, Johto, Sinnoh, and Unova?
And, then, there's this tweet from Toshinobu Matsumiya that actually references RGBY, GSC, and RSE over FRLG, HGSS, and ORAS. I know, Death of the Author, and all, but if remakes were always more canon, then why would he reference the original Gen 1-3 games over their remakes?
So, are remakes still the most canon? Who knows? It isn't that cut-and-dry, however.