- Joined
- Jun 28, 2013
- Messages
- 7,224
- Reaction score
- 9,172
Does anyone remember what those statues in the XY league look like? Trying to see if if any of the New UBs were hinted at way back when
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, it's accepted that it is two different lines. But just food for thoughtI think you may be onto something. Looking at this makes a lot of sense. Although can somebody clarify how they are laid out in the Pokédex for me? You say they're "behind" Solgaleo/Lunala, is that true?
Edit: Nvm, apparently Smogon says it's two different lines? I'm confused.
Yeah, it's accepted that it is two different lines. But just food for thought
Anyway, here is the 'behind' Solgaleo/Lunala image
Yup, these are not pokedex entries. Just the order of sprites which were found in the datamine. If it's really a 2-stage or a 3-stage evo we will know when the game comes out. But for now, it seems it is 2-stage, coz that's what everyone is saying...Ah, I see. So that's not necessarily the order they're in in the actual Pokédex, right?
To be fair it wouldn't have made sense to have fossil Pokémon since Alola is a series of volcanic islands, which are by nature relatively new landmasses and the lava is likely to destroy any fossils that could have been present.
Except Aerodactyl and the Carracosta/Archeops lines are in the Alola pokedex.
http://is.*********/vp/1476809751347.jpg
Unless they're just going to be catchable in the wild, they're still technically fossil Pokemon though...
Well for those, they can just have an NPC come along and say that he brought them from another region. Heck, for Aerodactyl it could even be one of the scientists from the Cinnabar lab, if they want to throw in another Kanto reference.
Why classify them as fossil Pokémon at all, then? At that point, it would just be a new Rock-type - Aerodactyl and the Unova fossils at least have backgrounds of being found as fossils.If they were going to do that couldn't they just introduce new fossil Pokemon and say the same thing though?
I mean Yungoos/Gumshoos were imported into Alola from who knows where so I don't see what the problem would have been to have the origin of the fossils kept vague.
Why classify them as fossil Pokémon at all, then? At that point, it would just be a new Rock-type - Aerodactyl and the Unova fossils at least have backgrounds of being found as fossils.
If they were going to do that couldn't they just introduce new fossil Pokemon and say the same thing though?
What about?data444.eox alolPoke 4/49
alolDragonite-_fairydragon
alolArcanine-_water
alolGengar-_ghostfire
alolVictreebel-_grassfire
data444.eox alolPoke 12/49
alolGolduck-_psychicdark
alolParasect-_ghostbug
alolMachamp-_fightinggrass
alolKangaskhan-_rock
alolNidoking-_poisonrock
alolNidoqueen-_poisonrock
alolPrimeape-_fightingelectric
alolGolem-_rockfire
Just wait. It's not just the slide I posted. Very bottom of page is link to next. It goes through a good amount of them
yeah i don't think they took the time to scrub everything but some unrevealed Pokemon's Pokedex images intentionally leaving in the rest with some of that rest being unrevealed ones even still.Is everyone like totally convinced that there won't be any new Pokémon or Alola Forms that were left out of the Demo? I was kind of hoping Alolan Kabuto and Omanyte would be the fossils of Alola
Because then they don't have to create four more Pokémon?
To be fair it wouldn't have made sense to have fossil Pokémon since Alola is a series of volcanic islands, which are by nature relatively new landmasses and the lava is likely to destroy any fossils that could have been present.