Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did entertain this idea at first, but then I realized that the two stories aren't contradictory. Think of the twin heroes as the founding fathers of Isshu; does that mean that the combined entity of Reshiram and Zekrom couldn't have lived there previously? Reshiram and Zekrom did destroy Isshu when the sons of the twin heroes were at war. Even though the idea might seem a little convoluted, it is certainly feasible that said war wasn't the first time the two Dragons had changed (in this case by becoming divided) as well as transformed the entire region.Venator said:This is entirely my own thoughts and something that may seem radical but maybe Game Freak decided the "storyline" of the two brothers was truly a legend and the cuneiform from the temple is the actual history?
You'd think that these would be directions to get to the upper floors of the ruins, but I don't see how that is the case; the corners aren't numbered in any obvious way.fishmonklv said:I think the first set of numbers are directions to get somewhere. It mentions turning at specific corners.
I can't see that. The idea of a human defeating a legendary Pokémon completely by himself is jarring given the scope of the series. Regardless of whether or not the king had special powers, why would he be superior to either Reshiram or Zekrom? Remember that Game Freak made a point of having N befriend his legendary partner as opposed to defeating it. As for the player, they obviously had to rely on their own Pokémon; that was the point of the plot.Defeating Reshiram or Zekrom alone, while pretty impressive, wouldn't be undoable: There are plenty of stories in the real world about heroes slaying dragons with only their strength and their wits, so it's not impossible that a similar event could take place in the Pokemon World (perhaps in that rarely mentioned time before humans battled with Pokemon the way they do today).
What I'm getting at is that the king wasn't necessarily humanlike. But if your assumption is that the combined entity of Reshiram and Zekrom was a black-and-white dragon, where would Kyurem fall in that? It would be redundant if all three came from the same Pokémon.I do agree that the third version might go into more detail about these glyphs, but I don't think Kyurem's original form was humanlike. In fact, I think Kyurem might be like what Reshiram and Zekrom were before they were split (and if a new form is revealed, it'll make this clearer).
All I'm saying is that it wouldn't be inconceivable for the King to have done that on his own. Then again, who knows what it means by "on his own"? Perhaps he used Pokemon, but his people didn't include them when retelling his exploits. Perhaps he weakened it first, like Susano did with Yamata_nrochi (Yes, I know he's kind of a god himself, but you get the point). N chose to befriend his legendary partner BECAUSE he needed its power to drive humans and Pokemon apart; besides, he later tried to defeat your own legendary, bringing his story back into balance with the ancient king's. As to why his plan's didn't quite match the king's, what's written in the Underwater Ruins is a history, not a prophecy.I can't see that. The idea of a human defeating a legendary Pokémon completely by himself is jarring given the scope of the series. Regardless of whether or not the king had special powers, why would he be superior to either Reshiram or Zekrom? Remember that Game Freak made a point of having N befriend his legendary partner as opposed to defeating it. As for the player, they obviously had to rely on their own Pokémon; that was the point of the plot.
What I'm getting at is that the king wasn't necessarily humanlike. But if your assumption is that the combined entity of Reshiram and Zekrom was a black-and-white dragon, where would Kyurem fall in that? It would be redundant if all three came from the same Pokémon.
I would have expected to see some sort of discussion about the ancient text in the ruins somewhere in the English-speaking community, but apparently that sort of thing isn't very interesting. In the Japanese community, on the other hand, the text was deciphered no more than a week after the games' release. I've known about this for some time, myself.
We should try to keep the discussion practical by focusing our attention on the Ancient Crown. Unlike with the other precious items, the person who offers to buy the crown actually recommends that the player keep the item and find a more noble use for it than monetary gain. Where were Game Freak going with this?Where were Game Freak going with this? After what happened with the Lock Capsule, I think it is safe to assume that the Ancient Crown will find a use in the third version, but unfortunately, it may not be worth the hype.
Well each of the messages is on a specific pillar, but the Corner ones just don't seem to connect in any way.@Silktree The corners may be left unmarked for a reason. Maybe if someone followed the intructions, we would get to the heart of the kingdom?
Also, perhaps the third version will explain why the ruins were underwater. Or the Giant Hole. Or something.
Maybe... they do? Do we have a layout of the ruins?Well each of the messages is on a specific pillar, but the Corner ones just don't seem to connect in any way.
We do. They're pillars 18, 16, 21 and 20 in this map.(In order, 2nd/3rd/5th/7th. Also the pillar numbers aren't official and just the order that the person that made the image listed them in.)Maybe... they do? Do we have a layout of the ruins?
Going from each entrance, in order, we get exactly one actual turn away from the center green thing. What is the center green thing?)[It works in img tags]
Hm, really? Interesting... I don't know why the blue dots aren't on that map, maybe the maker didn't put them on. The green spot is where you rise to the second floor.Going from each entrance, in order, we get exactly one actual turn away from the center green thing. What is the center green thing?
Also, where are the blue things representing items?
It's hard to imagine that those particular symbols could be interpreted in any way other than by counting the number of lines in them. More importantly, the connection to prime numbers isn't a theory, as the text confirms it: "Primes lead to truth."Since the 3/5/7 numbers are based on interpretation of '[symbol]th', I wonder if what were thought to be 5 and 7 might be 4 and 5 then... wouldn't quite match with the primes theory someone suggested though.